| |
2004 Start of Year project budgets
At their September meeting, the Council approved a start of year budget
for 2004. This budget was developed in several steps. We began with the
2004 existing budget recommendations. These exist for all provinces except
the Columbia Gorge and Intermountain provinces. At the province meetings
held during July and August we talked with sponsors about the status of
their projects. Sponsors either confirmed the existing recommendations
from the Provincial Review process or suggested changes to their budgets.
For the Columbia Gorge and Intermountain, sponsors proposed budgets to
continue ongoing work, keeping project scope consistent with past years.
We sorted project information collected at the province meetings into
several categories.
- Projects will not be conducted or will require less funding than as
originally conceived by sponsors and recommended by the Council.
- Projects that were unable to implement all approved work in FY 2003,
and would complete approved unimplemented FY 2003 work in FY 2004
while also implementing all approved FY2004 work -- “Candidates for
“rescheduling” (option 1 type).
- Projects that were approved to begin implementation in FY 2003, but
did not, and would shift FY 2003 work to FY 2004 (and move FY 2004
work to FY 2005, etc.) — “Candidates for rescheduling” (option 2
type).
- Projects that seek additional funds to modify or expand the scope of
approved work, or additional funds for cost of living or increased
administrative costs.
For the start of year budget, the Council recommended that projects proceed
at the budget levels developed and approved in the provincial reviews.
Exceptions to this are projects that require less funding than the
recommended amount, and projects that identified work that could be “rescheduled”
from 2003 to 2004. Other requests for budget increases, such as increases
in project operation and maintenance funding or for changes in scope were
not approved at the September 2003 meeting. These requests will be
considered during the “quarterly project status review” meetings. The
first meeting will be held in mid-November. At these meetings, we will
identify projects that are not likely to spend all of their budget and
projects that need additional funding for scope changes or increases in
operations and maintenance.
The total recommended budget was $154,018,158. Although this budget
exceeds the $139,000,000 cap established by Bonneville, the Council
believes that by using the “rescheduling” and “unspent funds”
concepts developed by Bonneville, we can fund the program for 2004 at
$154,018,158.
Thank you to project sponsors for taking the time to provide all of the
information to us during a busy field season!
View the issue memo (60k PDF)
, the full spreadsheet report (1.2mb
Excel), or project recommendations:
|
|