High-Level Indicators Table
The following indicators were approved by the Council in October 2009, and continued to be revised.
November 2010 update: Changes below are highlighted and shown in strike-out text.
|
October 7, 2009 Council Meeting |
Additional information on the indicators |
|||
| Draft Fish and Wildlife Program Management Questions | High Level Indicator | Fish and Wildlife Program Indicator | Potential Performance Measures Indicators | Timeline for first reporting |
| (Council Report to Congress) | (Recommended for SOTR) | (suggestions for HLI reported to Congress marked as "(Congress)" ) | (Depending on data availability) | |
Biological Indicators |
||||
| Are
|
Abundance of Fish and Wildlife | Abundance of salmon and steelhead
in the
|
Annual abundance of juvenile out-migrant, adult, and spawners of hatchery and wild salmon and steelhead by ESU (Congress) | 2010 report |
| Annual abundance of hatchery and wild salmon
and steelhead adults returning to the mouth of the
|
2010 report | |||
| Annual abundance of hatchery and wild salmon and steelhead adults passing dams and entering the Willamette River, mid Columbia River, Upper Columbia River and the lower Snake River | 2010 report | |||
| Abundance of pacific lamprey and
sturgeon in the
|
Annual abundance of harvestable white sturgeon from mainstem (Congress) | 2010 report | ||
| Annual index for pacific lamprey (Congress) | 2010 report | |||
| Annual abundance of
|
2011 or later report | |||
| Annual abundance of lamprey passing dams and entering the Willamette River, mid Columbia River, Upper Columbia River and the lower Snake River | 2010 report | |||
| Smolt-Adult return rates for ESA listed salmon
and steelhead in the
|
Smolt to adult returns for select populations
within an MPG and ESU within the Snake River and upper
|
2011 or later report | ||
| Abundance of focal resident fish species in the
|
TBD | 2011 or later report | ||
| Wildlife species abundance and
diversity in the
|
Abundance over time of wildlife critical species that have a strong association with salmon | 2010 | ||
| Functional critical wildlife species diversity over time | 2011 or later report | |||
| State agencies bird species diversity and breeding pair counts | 2011 or later report | |||
| ESA listed or non-listed status and
trend of fish and wildlife in the
|
List status as reported by NOAA & USFWS for fish and wildlife | 2010 | ||
| ESA listed fish ESU/DPS/recovery unit is increasing, decreasing, or stable in abundance | 2010 | |||
| ESA listed salmonid ESU is at low, med, high risk based on NOAA's risk level | 2011 or later report | |||
| ESA listed Wildlife population is increasing, decreasing, or stable in abundance | 2011 or later report | |||
| Are the actions implemented by the Council Fish and Wildlife Program having the expected biological effect on fish and wildlife and their habitat? | Abundance of Fish and Wildlife | Production of wild fish related to habitat improvement actions | Number of additional juveniles produced due to implementing a given action | 2011 or later report |
| Predation on fish in the
|
Annual number of adult salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, and pacific lamprey consumed by pinnipeds (Congress) | 2011 or later report | ||
| Annual number of juvenile salmon and steelhead consumed by piscivorous birds and fish, specifically terns, cormorants and pikeminnow (Congress) | 2011 or later report | |||
| Are
|
Ecosystem Health (not yet Council-approved) | Watershed Health for fish and wildlife | TBD (Congress)
|
2011 or later report |
| Non-native species distribution | Change in distribution over time. | 2011 or later report | ||
| Are ocean conditions affecting
|
Ocean Condition | Trend over time of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), El Nino/Southern Oscillation Index, Pacific Northwest Index (PNI), Spring and fall transition Dates, Ocean Coastal Upwelling Index (CUI) | 2010 | |
| Ocean conditions and effect on coho and chinook ocean survival | 2011 or later report | |||
| Is climate change affecting fish and
wildlife in the
|
TBD | TBD | 2011 or later report | |
Implementation Indicators |
||||
| Are mainstem hydro operations meeting the Council Fish and Wildlife Program’s survival and passage objectives? | Hydrosystem Survival & Passage | Salmon and steelhead juvenile survival through Federal Columbia River Power System’s dams | Estimated actual survival of juvenile spring
chinook salmon and steelhead survival at snake river and lower
|
2010 |
| Estimated actual survival of juvenile salmon and steelhead survival in-river (Congress) | 2010 | |||
| Estimated actual survival of juvenile salmon and steelhead survival through the FCRPS system (Congress) | 2010 | |||
| Differential post-Bonneville dam survival of in-river versus transported juvenile salmon and steelhead (D-value) (Congress) | 2010 | |||
| Salmon and steelhead adult survival through Federal Columbia River Power System’s dams | Estimated actual survival through FCRPS for SR Fall Chinook, SR Spring -Summer Chinook, SR Sockeye, SR Steelhead, UCR Spring Chinook, UCR steelhead, MCR steelhead, LCR steelhead, CR Chum, LCR Chinook, LCR Coho (Congress) | 2010 | ||
| Is harvest consistent with the Council fish and wildlife program’s vision? | Council Actions | Harvest numbers and rates per year for salmon, steelhead, sturgeon, and resident fisheries. | Annual commercial, tribal, and recreational
mainstem harvest number of hatchery and wild salmon, steelhead
and sturgeon in the
|
2010 for mainstem;
2011 or later for tributary |
| Harvest rates for ESA listed fish (Congress) | 2010, for salmonids
2011 or later for other fish |
|||
| Contribution of Council’s Fish and Wildlife
program funded hatcheries to
|
TBD | 2011 or later | ||
| Does artificial production
complement resident and anadromous recovery and harvest goals
within the
|
Council Actions | Implementation of artificial production recommendations supported by the Council Fish and Wildlife Program’s | Report on percent of hatcheries meeting PNI, NOS, HOS recommendations under HSRG and HGMP | 2011 or later |
| Abundance of hatchery parr/smolts released complement abundance of wild parr/smolts in-stream | TBD | 2011 or later | ||
| Are the fish and wildlife losses associated with the development and operation of the Columbia River Basin’s hydrosystem being mitigated as described by the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program? (added Nov 2010) | To be developed | Define indicator for successful occurrence of Resident fish substitution to replace anadromous fish species loss due to hydrosystem | TBD | 2011 or later |
| Define indicator for wildlife losses | TBD | 2011 or later | ||
| Are Council program actions coordinated within the program and with other programs? | Council Actions | Wildlife habitat units acquired relative to loss by dam. | Annual Total minimum estimated and credited Habitat Unit (HU) acquired summed across all key species and dams (Congress) | 2010 |
| Cumulative HU to-date summed across all key species and dams (Congress) | 2010 | |||
| Number of instream fish passage improvements | Annual and cumulative number of partial and full fish passage barriers removed per target species ; Annual and cumulative number of new fish screens installed and replaced by target fish species (Congress) | 2010 | ||
| Potential maximum additional miles of fish habitat made accessible | Annual and cumulative potential maximum number of miles of habitat accessible by target fish species from removing a passage barrier structure (Congress) | 2010 | ||
| Amount of water conserved by conservation activities and water transactions for instream use. | Water conserved for fish annually and cumulatively in acres-feet and cubic-feet per second by installing a well, pipeline, sprinkler, and a line diversion ditch | 2010 | ||
| Water secured for fish annually and cumulatively in acres-feet and cubic-feet per second by acquiring water instream, leasing land, or purchasing land. | 2010 | |||
| Amount of land protected for fish and wildlife | Annual and cumulative number of riparian miles protected on purchased and leased land for salmon, steelhead, resident fish and wildlife. (Congress) | 2010 | ||
| Annual and cumulative number of acres per habitat type protected on purchased and leased land for salmon, steelhead, resident fish and wildlife (Congress) | 2010 | |||
| Amount of land receiving actions aimed at improving habitat for fish and wildlife | Annual and cumulative number of miles improved for salmon, steelhead, resident fish and wildlife by one or many of these actions increasing instream habitat complexity, removing vegetation, planting vegetation, fencing, spawning gravel, as well as realigning, connecting, and/or creating a channel | 2010 | ||
| Annual and cumulative number of acres per habitat type improved for salmon, steelhead, resident fish and wildlife by removing vegetation, planting vegetation, erosion and sedimentation control, control burn, enhance floodplain/remove modify, breach dike, as well as realigning, connecting, and/or creating a channel. | 2010 | |||
| Managing predation on adult and juvenile fish | Percent change in pikeminnow mortality, average size of pikeminnow; number of pikeminnow removed, and counts of pikeminnow rewards paid. | 2010 | ||
| Number of pinniped deterred from BON raceway | 2010 | |||
| Tern and cormorant colony size, and number of breeding pairs | 2010 | |||
| Define an indicator for: Progress in implementing action to address subbasin plan objectives and needs (limiting factors, priority reaches, etc) | TBD | 2011 or later | ||
| Coordination of Council Fish and Wildlife Program with other fish and wildlife entities, activities, and programs in the basin | TBD (Congress) | 2011 or later | ||
The Council approved, during its October 7, 2009 Council meeting in Idaho, three High-Level Indicators (HLI) to communicate to Congress on the biological and implementation progress accomplished by the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program.
The Council approved the following three HLI:
- Abundance of Fish and Wildlife,
- Hydrosystem Passage and Survival; and
- Council Actions.
The Council chose to postpone its decision on the fourth HLI, Ecosystem Health, until it is defined more clearly. This motion was passed:
Motion from F&W Committee as Adopted by Full Council
October 7, 2009-10-27
Sun Valley, IdahoThat the Council:
- Approve three High-Level Indicators in the Council's report to Congress: 1) Abundance of Fish and Wildlife, 2) Hydrosystem Survival and Passage, and 3) Council Actions
- Approve fish and wildlife program management questions as a working list
- Recommend that CBFWA include the fish and wildlife Program indicators in the status of the Resource report; all as presented by the staff and recommended by the Fish and Wildlife Committee and approved by the Council [with changes adopted by the Members at today's meeting]
The Council understands that the information for these indicators is either currently available or will be collected within existing budgets and that no additional Council funding obligation will result from the adoption of the indicators unless first approved by the Council.