| |
180-Day Review of Fish and Wildlife Governance
May 20, 1996 | document 97-10 (note: the report
sent to Congress is numbered 96-10)
read full report > (70k
PDF)
Background
In November 1995, Congress directed the Council to review and report
within 180 days on the most appropriate governance structure to allow more
effective regional control over efforts to conserve and enhance anadromous
and resident fish and wildlife within the Federal Columbia River Power
System.
For discussion purposes, the Council developed several possible
scenarios for this governance and then held a workshop in Portland on
February 1-2, 1996, to explore alternatives with interested parties.
The Council sent its final report to Congress on May 20, 1996.
Objectives
We identified seven ways to improve fish and wildlife governance:
- Integrate the three existing fish and wildlife recovery plans
(federal, tribal and the Council's).
- Establish clear responsibility for implementing the integrated plan.
- Establish dispute resolution mechanisms.
- Support watershed processes and integrate them into basinwide
decision-making.
- Establish monitoring and evaluation programs that measure results
and ensure accountability.
- Ensure credible scientific foundations for planning and
implementation.
- Secure and allocate a reliable budget.
Recommendations
On May 20, 1996, the Council issued its final report to Congress. In
its report, the Council noted that several initiatives are under way to
improve the region's voice in management of the Columbia River
hydropower system. For example, significant progress is being made in
building independent scientific review into the decisionmaking process, in
budget planning and prioritization and in coordinating implementation
activities. Moreover, in part as a result of the dialogue generated by the
review, a broad consensus has emerged on the steps the region needs to
take to improve the way decisions are made and implemented. The Council
believes the region can capitalize on these efforts by taking several
further steps:
- First, there is broad consensus that federal, state and tribal fish
and wildlife efforts should be consistent with each other. The Council
supports and will continue to help facilitate efforts to bring
sovereigns together periodically, on a basis of equality, to work
toward a single fish and wildlife program, and to coordinate technical
and policy aspects of implementation. Over the last year, federal,
state and tribal entities have been working together in a more
constructive manner. If these collaborative efforts fail, legislation
will be needed. The Council recommends that an executive order be
developed to help cement cooperation and greater consistency. An
executive order should direct the federal agencies to implement the
Council's fish and wildlife program insofar as permitted by their
statutory responsibilities, and to provide detailed, written
explanations if they diverge from the program.
- Second, if legislation is needed, the Council recommends that the
federal agencies that govern operations of the hydropower system --
the Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission and the federal fish and wildlife
agencies (the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service) insofar as their activities affect hydropower
operations -- be required to act consistently with the Columbia River
Basin Fish and Wildlife Program, which was developed under the
Northwest Power Act. Importantly, this change would not modify the
Endangered Species Act.
- Third, the Council commits to play an active role in monitoring
implementation of fish and wildlife mitigation measures. Based in part
on the requirements of the Northwest Power Act, mitigation funding can
be linked to progress in implementing a monitoring and evaluation
program.
- On several other matters, particularly dispute resolution and
integrated fish and wildlife budget management, the Council will
continue to work with interested parties and report further to the
Congress this fall.
read full report > (70k
PDF)
^ top
 |
Documents in Acrobat PDF format
require the Acrobat reader plugin |
|
|