Fish and wildlife APRE

DRAFT Basin-Level Report October 7, 2003  |  document 2003-17

read full report (2.7m PDF, or 2.1m Word) and appendices (230k PDF)

Related links:

• Final Basin-Level Report (2004-17)
• Public comments received to date
• Council's APRE site (includes links to province- and subbasin-level reports)
• Mobrand Biometric's APRE site for interactive APRE and HGMP reports
• Council press release

Executive summary

This report summarizes the results and conclusions of the Artificial Production Review and Evaluation (APRE) conducted by the Council in response to a request from Congress to review all federally funded hatchery programs in the Columbia River Basin. The goal of the review is to develop coordinated policies for the use of artificial production in the Basin. The Council subsequently expanded the review to include hatcheries supported by non-federal funds as well.

Interest in artificial production stems from scientific and policy concerns about the success of artificial production programs and how they affect other aspects of fisheries management. Despite the fact that artificial production has occurred in the Pacific Northwest for over 100 years, a comprehensive look at the success or failure of the programs has not been undertaken. The APRE partially addresses this deficiency by conducting an in-depth evaluation of 227 individual salmonid hatchery programs within the U.S. portion of the Columbia River Basin. The results of the review are expected to provide the basis for regional fisheries planning efforts by all parties involved in Pacific Northwest hatcheries. Discussions of the future of hatcheries and identification of the benefits and risks of hatchery practices should also occur as a result of the review and evaluation.

Hatcheries in the Columbia River Basin were established originally to maintain commercially harvestable numbers of salmon. Within the past few decades, however, the focus has changed to supplementation of wild populations. The passage of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and changing public perceptions about the importance and use of salmon have had great influences on the purpose of hatcheries.

For each hatchery program in the Basin, APRE identified the program?s purpose, the extent to which the program is meeting that purpose (benefit), and considered the potential for negative impacts on other purposes and priorities (risk). The review process was based on the hatchery review developed by the Hatchery Scientific Review Group (HSRG) in Washington State. Questionnaires which collected information on hatchery goals and operations from hatchery managers and operators were developed and the responses entered into a database (www.apre.info). The responses were evaluated against the APRE working hypothesis which states that:  a) to be successful, a hatchery program must be internally consistent with its own stated purpose and externally consistent with the goals and priorities of the environment, including other potentially affected fish populations; and b) almost any human intervention to manipulate the environment poses some level of risk to the existing environment and species. A hatchery program was judged to be successful if it met the following 4 major conditions:

1. It must produce a healthy and viable hatchery population.
2. It must make a sustainable contribution of adult returns to conservation and/or harvest.
3. Its potential effects on wild and native populations and the environment must be understood.
4. It must collect, record, evaluate, and disseminate information pertaining to the first three conditions so that decision-makers may be informed about the benefits and risks of the program relative to other means of achieving similar conservation and harvest goals.

The information database is intended to form the foundation for continuing consideration of artificial production in the Basin. The individual program reports contain a summary of facility information including operator, funding sources, and overall performance. The database is designed to be updated as new information becomes available and hatchery reforms are enacted.

The results of the APRE are examined in 6 major categories:  fish stocks, hatchery operations, distribution of hatchery releases, hatchery goals and purposes, funding, and monitoring and evaluation.

• Fish Stocks:  The study identified 505 fish stocks of which 245 were natural stocks, 115 were integrated[1] stocks, and 145 were segregated[2] hatchery stocks. The majority of stocks were found in the Lower Columbia province.
• Hatchery Operation:  The majority of hatchery programs in the lower Columbia River are segregated; most in the upper river are integrated programs.
• Hatchery Practices:  Many segregated hatchery programs contribute significantly to wild spawning populations, despite the intention to separate hatchery and wild fish. The amount of mixing was unknown in a third of segregated programs. In addition, 41 percent used non-local broodstock and 63 percent transferred or released fish from outside the stream system. In contrast, 91 percent of integrated programs used broodstock derived from within the subbasin and 81 percent avoided transfer or release of fish from outside the subbasin.
• Distribution of Hatchery Releases:  Hatchery managers reported planned releases of 235,690,000 juvenile fish of all species from hatchery programs in the U.S. portion of the Columbia River Basin. Approximately 88 percent or 207,734,500 fish are planned releases of anadromous salmonids below the fish passage barriers at the Chief Joseph and Hells Canyon dams. The largest proportion (42 percent) occurs in the Lower Columbia Province, as a result of earlier attempts to provide fish for the ocean and lower river commercial fisheries.
• Goals and Purpose:  Harvest remains the primary reason for hatchery programs in the Columbia River Basin. This is particularly the case in the lower river; the purpose of upper river programs appears more evenly divided between harvest and conservation.
• Funding:  Identification of hatchery funding is a complex issue because most programs are funded from a variety of direct and indirect sources. The Lower Columbia province has the most funding because it has the majority of programs.
• Monitoring and Evaluation:  Monitoring and evaluation consists primarily of reports of typical fish statistics such as number of recruits per spawner, smolt-to-adult survival, escapement, and total catch. Even so, many programs did not collect information for any of these categories. Information on the number of recruits per spawner was collected for less than 5 percent of programs, smolt-to-adult survival figures were available for 35.6 percent of programs, escapement figures were collected for 20.7 percent of programs, and about 33 percent of programs had information on escapement.

The APRE was designed to address concerns that the Columbia River Basin hatchery system needed to be reformed. The study applied hatchery reform principles developed by the HSRG to the information received from the fishery and hatchery managers. These principles included the following:

• Goals for stocks affected by hatcheries must be clearly articulated, expressed in terms of resource values, and reflective of current biological, economic, and cultural circumstances.
• Hatchery programs must be scientifically defensible.
• Decision-making about hatchery programming and operations must be responsive and well-informed.

When these principles were applied, a number of questions arose about artificial production within the Basin. These questions explored such issues as whether or not hatchery programs can be used more strategically to better accommodate ecological and social goals and how many hatchery fish should be released each year. Broad answers to these questions were formulated and used to arrive at the general conclusions of the study:

• Hatcheries are limited in what they can accomplish.
• The social, economic, and ecological purposes upon which the current hatchery programs were established have changed and will continue to change.
• Hatcheries will continue to play a part in recovery and management of fish in the Columbia River and elsewhere.
• Hatcheries require reform to align their policies and practices with current social priorities and scientific knowledge, to determine hatchery performance, and to operate in a business-like fashion.

[1] An integrated program uses an open production cycle in which the hatchery population is combined with  the natural population to form a single aggregate population.

[2] A segregated stock is intended to have minimal influence from and on surrounding natural stocks;  interbreeding between hatchery and wild fish is minimized.

^ top

Documents in Acrobat PDF format require the Acrobat reader plugin