council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting June 10 - 11, 2025 in Missoula › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2024
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
NOV 2024
THU
21
1:00 pm—2:00 pm
Resource Cost Framework in Power Plan Webinar
NOV 2024
FRI
22
9:30 am—11:30 am
Fuels Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
MON
02
11:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
WED
28
Council Meeting Executive Session
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2025
WED
09
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
THU
18
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Economics of the Northern Pike Invasion in the Columbia River Basin

Council Document Number: 
2019-7
Published date: 
June 10, 2019
Document state: 
Published

Executive Summary

In a recent letter from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (hereinafter the Council) to the Independent Science Advisory Board (ISAB), the Council posed two questions to be reviewed by economists.

The first question is:

What information is needed to assess the economic impacts to natural resources in the Basin should Northern Pike spread throughout the anadromous and non-anadromous zones? If such information exists, can you estimate the economic impacts of the spread of Northern Pike?

Estimating the economic costs of the spread of Northern Pike (Esox Lucius) (hereinafter NP) throughout the Columbia River Basin (CRB) would involve a large-scale, ecological-economic modeling exercise. Such a study is beyond the scope of this report. Instead, we describe the scope of economic and ecological modeling that would be necessary to estimate the range of possible medium- and long-run consequences of an expanded NP invasion according to best practices for economic analysis. The main points from our review include:

  • Evaluating the consequences of an expanded NP invasion would require understanding multiple potential outcomes of interactions among species once NP spread to the anadromous zones and currently uninvaded non-anadromous zones of the CRB.
  • Parallel to (and integrated with) the ecological research required, a social science research effort would be needed to estimate the social and individual behavioral responses to, and the resulting costs arising from, an expanded NP invasion.
  • Some useful information is available now or may be obtained/estimated in the near-term (e.g., potential costs associated with modifying hydro-operations, activity that may potentially be used to partially compensate for a net increase in predation on native species of concern).
  • A fully-developed model integrating biological and socioeconomic processes will also focus on quantifying uncertainty, including uncertainty over how the population dynamics in the model will influence estimated costs over time.

The second question from the Council to be reviewed by economists is:

For the related ISAB question regarding level of Northern Pike suppression needed (question 5, above), can you calculate the costs associated with that?

Here “question 5” refers to the following question for ISAB:

In consideration of ISRP 2018-3 regarding Northern Pike, do we know what level of suppression (exploitation) through gill net removal, angler removal or other methods is needed to reduce the population in Lake Roosevelt to a level sufficient to reduce risk of emigration from the lake or risk to other focal management species?

In a recent report (ISAB 2019), the ISAB responded to question 5. ISAB was unable to determine either:

  • The level of Lake Roosevelt northern pike suppression "sufficient to reduce risk of emigration from the lake"; or
  • The level of Lake Roosevelt northern pike suppression "sufficient to reduce [...] risk to other focal management species"

Given that ISAB is unable to provide the quantitative targets requested by the Council, we approach the second economic question by describing the information needed to produce a cost estimate for a hypothetical management program that meets best practices for economic analysis. Our observations include:

  • A multi-species spatial population model for Lake Roosevelt (LR) that includes NP and NP prey species is required to estimate long-term costs of suppression.
  • Some costs may be drawn from recent LR suppression effort and planning. However, these are not adequate to provide a useful upper or lower bound on the range of expected costs of suppression in LR.
  • Monitoring and research are likely to remain components of NP suppression in LR. Both activities should be included in an overall cost estimate.

Our hope is that this report will be read as an invitation for investment in interdisciplinary research on human-natural systems in the CRB, and in particular the economics and ecology of invasive species control. Substantial evidence suggests that NP may prove to be a costly invader in the CRB that is unlikely to be eradicated. Unfortunately, it is also unlikely to be the last harmful aquatic invader introduced to the region. Investment in quantitative decision support tools now, with input from economists and natural scientists, may facilitate rapid assessment and informed prioritization of management resources in the future.

Lastly, we do not attempt to draw conclusions regarding the economic merits of any particular method of suppression or level of funding for NP management in the CRB.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Fish and WildlifeColumbia River BasinNorthern PikePredationInvasive SpeciesLake RooseveltEconomic AnalysisNon-native FishNon-native PredatorNon-native SpeciesEconomics

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement