council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting June 10 - 11, 2025 in Missoula › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2024
WED
06
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
THU
07
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
NOV 2024
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
NOV 2024
THU
21
1:00 pm—2:00 pm
Resource Cost Framework in Power Plan Webinar
NOV 2024
FRI
22
9:30 am—11:30 am
Fuels Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
MON
02
11:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Final review of the Columbia River Fish Accord proposal, Deschutes River Fall Chinook Research and Monitoring (2008-306-00)

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2009-25
Published date: 
June 30, 2009
Document state: 
Published

To: W. Bill Booth, Council Chair

From: Eric Loudenslager, ISRP Chair

Background

At the Council’s June 10, 2009 request, the ISRP reviewed a response received from the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation regarding our December 15, 2008 review of the Columbia River Fish Accord proposal titled Deschutes River Fall Chinook Research and Monitoring (200830600). In our December 2008 review, we found that the proposal did not provide sufficient information for our technical review and thus did not meet scientific review criteria.

The project intent is to access multiple methods and develop new methods, if necessary, in order to accurately estimate Deschutes River Fall Chinook escapement. Weather and turbidity during fall Chinook upstream migration and spawning has made accurate estimates difficult. The project proponent also intends to assess the feasibility of developing a full duplex PIT tag array to span the width of the Deschutes River near the mouth, which would allow escapement assessments using a non-visual method.

Recommendation: Meets Scientific Review Criteria In Part (Qualified)
  • Objective 1 – Meets Scientific Review Criteria (in part)

The need of determining spawners’ genetic composition was adequately justified, but our concern with the inability to distinguish between wild-origin and hatchery-origin fish was not addressed. An accurate count of wild Chinook escapement is not possible if this distinction cannot be made. This ability, both in terms of accuracy and efficiency, remains a critical uncertainty for the project to succeed. The tasks to complete this objective should begin with feasibility investigations that demonstrate that hatchery and wild fish can be accurately distinguished with the proposed genetic baseline. Full implementation should follow reporting and review of the feasibility data.

Baker et al. (2009) [reference cited by proponents in their response to the ISRP’s review] state: "a study to determine stock origin of Chinook carcasses collected aster successfully spawning is currently underway (J. Graham, CTWSRO, pers. Comm.)." The proponents need to clarify that the proposed objective does not duplicate ongoing research already funded by other sources.

  • Objective 2 – Meets Scientific Review Criteria
  • Objective 3 – Does Not Meet Scientific Review Criteria

Objective 3 is premature because the feasibility of the PIT tag array is unknown and including a project objective that relies upon a successful deployment of a PIT tag array is not appropriate at this time.

  • Objective 4 – Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)

In the last review of this proposal (re Task 4.3 of Objective 4), the ISRP asked how new redds would be distinguished from those observed/recorded on previous surveys. The proponents provided no information to address this question. We would expect that this minor point be addressed in the next draft of this proposal.

  • Objective 5 – Meets Scientific Review Criteria

Specific Comments

Project title and objectives consistency

The authors adequately addressed the ISRP’s concerns with the original title of this proposal which indicated that the goal of the project was to establish biologically based escapement goals by changing the title to "Deschutes River Fall Chinook Research and Monitoring." The goal of this project is to improve monitoring of fall Chinook salmon populations in the Deschutes River. It will not establish biologically-based escapement goals.

Objective 1 – Genetic Analysis

The ISRP’s recommendation regarding the need for the genetic analysis to differentiate Deschutes River fish from strays was adequately addressed. Clearly, the preliminary data indicate that the number of non-Deschutes River fish at the site where returning adult fish are enumerated is quite high. However, our request for more information about the ability to differentiate wild and hatchery-origin Deschutes River salmon was not addressed. This ability, both in terms of accuracy and efficiency, remains a critical uncertainty for the project to succeed.

Objective 2 – PIT Tag Array Feasibility

In response to the ISRP’s questions regarding the lack of details in justification for the full duplex PIT tag array, the proponents provided adequate information regarding the challenges associated with the establishment of a PIT tag array on the Deschutes River and a detailed list of steps planned to determine the feasibility of installing such an array.

Objective 3 – Developing Escapement Methods

The response to the ISRP’s concern that this objective relies on the installation of a PIT tag array indicates that there is a high degree of confidence that a PIT tag array will be installed during the 10-year lifespan of this study. This optimism appears to be based on the fact that a PIT tag array was installed on the John Day River. However, in the response to our comments on Objective 2, the authors indicate that, despite the success on the John Day River, there are daunting challenges that must be addressed in order to install the PIT tag array on the Deschutes River. For this reason, the request for funding to implement Objective 3 is premature at this time. However, if there were an alternative to a full-river PIT tag array that could be implemented that would enable this objective to be addressed, inclusion of this objective in the current proposal would be reasonable.

Objective 4 – Validation of Aerial Redd Counts

The comments the ISRP provided on the original proposal included a question about the redd census procedure described in Task 4.3 (of Objective 4). We asked for some clarification on the determination of redd superimposition and how new redds will be distinguished from those observed on previous surveys. No response to these comments was provided. These concerns are not major issues, and the approach proposed for completing Objective 4 is appropriate. However, results will be much improved if the project proponents develop a methodology that addresses these concerns.

Objective 5 – Carcass Surveys

The proponents provided a detailed adequate response regarding the ISRP’s questions about the tagging of wild fall Chinook juveniles including a good summary table of tag data.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Monitoring and EvaluationProposalFall ChinookResearchISRPFish AccordDeschutes River2008-306-00

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement