council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting July 15 - 16, 2025 in Portland › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
WED
28
Council Meeting Executive Session
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2025
WED
25
3:00 pm—4:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
THU
26
8:30 am—2:00 pm
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
WED
09
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
THU
17
9:30 am—3:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
JUL 2025
MON
21
10:30 am—12:00 pm
Public Affairs Committee
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
THU
18
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Acquiring Energy Efficiency More Efficiently

Council Document Number: 
94-52
Published date: 
Nov. 8, 1994
Document state: 
Published

Can electric utilities continue to acquire the efficiency resource in the ways that have been employed since the early 1980s, or are there potentially more efficient and effective ways to secure energy savings that should be given serious consideration?  That is the question this paper explores.

Energy conservation programs have been a success in the Northwest. In the last 15 years the electric utilities in the Northwest captured nearly 800 average megawatts of energy-efficiency improvements through conservation programs. These energy savings cost significantly less than alternative electrical resources available during that period.

In addition, there were significant efficiency gains attributable to improved residential and commercial energy codes. During this decade, the two most populous states in the region, Oregon and Washington, and several local jurisdictions in Idaho and Montana, adopted energy codes for new residential and commercial buildings that are the among the most rigorous in the nation. These codes will result in several hundred megawatts of savings. Utility support has been critical to implementing these codes.

At the federal level, minimum efficiency standards were established for major residential appliances. Also at the federal level, the National Energy Policy Act of 1992, established new efficiency standards for some lamps, lighting equipment, electric motors, commercial heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment and shower heads. These standards will result in savings that do not have to be sought through utility programs.

The Council estimates that these local, state and federal codes and standards have already contributed an additional 150 average megawatts of savings.

The Northwest Power Planning Council’s 1991 Power Plan sets an ambitious goal of an additional 1,500 average megawatts of cost-effective efficiency savings by the end of the decade. So far, the Council’s tracking effort indicates that the region is on the path to achieving its conservation goals. Efficiency continues to be an attractive resource. Nearly one half of it is available for less than two-thirds of the cost of a new combined-cycle combustion turbine. It is environmentally benign. It is not subject to the risks of increasing fuel prices. Based on a Council staff analysis, even with natural gas price escalation rates at approximately 40 percent below those used in the 1991 plan, the acquisition of conservation resources of this magnitude remained regionally cost-effective. Analysis conducted by the Council also shows that if 30 percent of the energy savings now called for in the plan fail to materialize, the present value cost to the region would be approximately $1.8 billion higher.

Despite the successes of the past decade, there is reason to question whether the region can continue to acquire energy savings in the ways employed since the early 1980s. The changing utility environment may call into question the means by which we acquire the conservation resource.

There are two key factors in this new environment. First, the benchmark resource with which efficiency must compete is no longer a capital-intensive, long lead time, inflexible and expensive coal plant that costs two to three times more than the average efficiency resources. Now the competition is a low capital cost, short lead time, highly flexible and relatively clean natural gas-fired combustion turbine. The levelized cost of power from a combustion turbine is not much more than the cost of the average efficiency resource. At the very minimum, this implies that developers of efficiency must be very cost-conscious if they wish to compete.

In addition, because combustion turbines have low capital costs and the utility’s revenues are not reduced as they are with conservation, there will be slightly smaller impacts on rates with combustion turbines than with efficiency. Because the costs of the conservation are essentially all front-loaded capital costs, the rate impact of the conservation will be greatest in the near term. However, as gas prices rise, the power from combustion turbines will begin to be more expensive than most efficiency resources in the long run.

The rate impacts of conservation interact with the second major factor in the changing utility environment — increasing utility concerns about their competitiveness. As the utility industry restructures itself in response to ongoing technological and regulatory changes, many utilities are becoming concerned about their ability to be competitive suppliers. This is certainly the case with the Bonneville Power Administration’s concerns about being a competitive wholesale supplier of electricity. It is also a concern for some retail utilities that fear the loss of major industrial or commercial customers to lower-price power providers. Some are beginning to question whether demand-side management can be sustained in a more competitive utility environment. Will utilities concerned about near-term rate competitiveness continue to invest in a long-term resource like efficiency?

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement