Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum
  • Resource Strategies Advisory Committee (Not Active)

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

Energy Forums and Workgroups

  • Pacific NW Demand Response Project
  • Northwest Wind Integration Forum (Archive)
Meetings
See next Council Meeting August 16 - 17, 2022 in (Webinar) › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
SEP 2021
TUE
21
10:00 am—11:00 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE WED
21 - 22
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
27
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Montana
SEP 2021
WED
29
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
07
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Washington
OCT 2021
TUE
12
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Oregon
OCT 2021
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
14
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Idaho
OCT 2021
TUE
19
9:30 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
09
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
30
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
DEC 2021
TUE WED
07 - 08
RTF Meeting
DEC 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—11:00 am
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
DEC 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
WED
19
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
JAN 2022
TUE
25
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation: January 25, 2022
JAN 2022
WED
26
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2022
FRI
28
8:30 am—11:30 am
Power Committee Meeting
FEB 2022
MON
14
9:00 am—10:30 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
FEB 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
FEB 2022
WED
23
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—3:00 pm
System Integration Forum: Scope of Work on Potential Lower Snake River Dam Analysis
MAR 2022
TUE
08
1:30 pm—2:30 pm
Public Affairs Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
MON TUE
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2022
FRI
18
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
30
9:30 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE WED
10 - 11
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
MAY 2022
WED
18
Council Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE
24
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
08
1:00 pm—3:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
9:30 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2022
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
22
9:00 am—2:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
06
F&W Committee Meeting
JUL 2022
FRI
08
9:00 am—10:30 am
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Steering Committee
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
27
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—12:45 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
10
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
30
9:00 am—11:00 am
F&W Committee Meeting
SEP 2022
MON
12
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
20 - 21
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE
08
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
06 - 07
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Acquiring Energy Efficiency More Efficiently

Council Document Number: 
94-52
Published date: 
Nov. 8, 1994
Document state: 
Published

Share

Can electric utilities continue to acquire the efficiency resource in the ways that have been employed since the early 1980s, or are there potentially more efficient and effective ways to secure energy savings that should be given serious consideration?  That is the question this paper explores.

Energy conservation programs have been a success in the Northwest. In the last 15 years the electric utilities in the Northwest captured nearly 800 average megawatts of energy-efficiency improvements through conservation programs. These energy savings cost significantly less than alternative electrical resources available during that period.

In addition, there were significant efficiency gains attributable to improved residential and commercial energy codes. During this decade, the two most populous states in the region, Oregon and Washington, and several local jurisdictions in Idaho and Montana, adopted energy codes for new residential and commercial buildings that are the among the most rigorous in the nation. These codes will result in several hundred megawatts of savings. Utility support has been critical to implementing these codes.

At the federal level, minimum efficiency standards were established for major residential appliances. Also at the federal level, the National Energy Policy Act of 1992, established new efficiency standards for some lamps, lighting equipment, electric motors, commercial heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment and shower heads. These standards will result in savings that do not have to be sought through utility programs.

The Council estimates that these local, state and federal codes and standards have already contributed an additional 150 average megawatts of savings.

The Northwest Power Planning Council’s 1991 Power Plan sets an ambitious goal of an additional 1,500 average megawatts of cost-effective efficiency savings by the end of the decade. So far, the Council’s tracking effort indicates that the region is on the path to achieving its conservation goals. Efficiency continues to be an attractive resource. Nearly one half of it is available for less than two-thirds of the cost of a new combined-cycle combustion turbine. It is environmentally benign. It is not subject to the risks of increasing fuel prices. Based on a Council staff analysis, even with natural gas price escalation rates at approximately 40 percent below those used in the 1991 plan, the acquisition of conservation resources of this magnitude remained regionally cost-effective. Analysis conducted by the Council also shows that if 30 percent of the energy savings now called for in the plan fail to materialize, the present value cost to the region would be approximately $1.8 billion higher.

Despite the successes of the past decade, there is reason to question whether the region can continue to acquire energy savings in the ways employed since the early 1980s. The changing utility environment may call into question the means by which we acquire the conservation resource.

There are two key factors in this new environment. First, the benchmark resource with which efficiency must compete is no longer a capital-intensive, long lead time, inflexible and expensive coal plant that costs two to three times more than the average efficiency resources. Now the competition is a low capital cost, short lead time, highly flexible and relatively clean natural gas-fired combustion turbine. The levelized cost of power from a combustion turbine is not much more than the cost of the average efficiency resource. At the very minimum, this implies that developers of efficiency must be very cost-conscious if they wish to compete.

In addition, because combustion turbines have low capital costs and the utility’s revenues are not reduced as they are with conservation, there will be slightly smaller impacts on rates with combustion turbines than with efficiency. Because the costs of the conservation are essentially all front-loaded capital costs, the rate impact of the conservation will be greatest in the near term. However, as gas prices rise, the power from combustion turbines will begin to be more expensive than most efficiency resources in the long run.

The rate impacts of conservation interact with the second major factor in the changing utility environment — increasing utility concerns about their competitiveness. As the utility industry restructures itself in response to ongoing technological and regulatory changes, many utilities are becoming concerned about their ability to be competitive suppliers. This is certainly the case with the Bonneville Power Administration’s concerns about being a competitive wholesale supplier of electricity. It is also a concern for some retail utilities that fear the loss of major industrial or commercial customers to lower-price power providers. Some are beginning to question whether demand-side management can be sustained in a more competitive utility environment. Will utilities concerned about near-term rate competitiveness continue to invest in a long-term resource like efficiency?

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement