council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting June 10 - 11, 2025 in Missoula › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2024
WED
06
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
THU
07
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
NOV 2024
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
NOV 2024
THU
21
1:00 pm—2:00 pm
Resource Cost Framework in Power Plan Webinar
NOV 2024
FRI
22
9:30 am—11:30 am
Fuels Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
MON
02
11:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

APRE Final Basin-Level Report

Council Document Number: 
2004-17
Published date: 
Nov. 30, 2004
Document state: 
Published

This report summarizes the results and conclusions of the Artificial Production Review and Evaluation (APRE) conducted by the Council in response to a request from Congress to review all federally funded hatchery programs in the Columbia River Basin. The goal of the review is to develop coordinated policies for the use of artificial production in the Basin. 

Interest in a comprehensive review of artificial production in the Basin stems from scientific and policy concerns about the success of artificial production programs and how they affect other aspects of fisheries management. Despite the fact that artificial production has occurred in the Pacific Northwest for over 100 years, a comprehensive evaluation of the programs has not been undertaken. The APRE partially addresses this deficiency by conducting an in-depth evaluation of 225 individual salmonid hatchery programs within the U.S. portion of the Columbia River Basin. The results of the review are expected to provide a basis for regional fisheries planning efforts by all parties involved in Pacific Northwest hatcheries. Discussions of the future of hatcheries and identification of the benefits and risks of hatchery practices should also occur as a result of the review and evaluation.

Hatcheries in the Columbia River Basin were established originally to maintain commercially harvestable numbers of salmon. Within the past few decades, however, the focus of restoration has turned more toward supplementation of wild populations. The passage of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and changing public perceptions about the importance and use of salmon have had great influences on the purpose of hatcheries. 

For each hatchery program in the Basin, APRE identified the program's purpose, the extent to which the program is meeting that purpose (benefit), and considered the potential for negative impacts on other purposes and priorities (risk). The review process was based on the hatchery review developed by the Hatchery Scientific Review Group (HSRG) in Washington State. Questionnaires which collected information on hatchery goals and operations from hatchery managers and operators were developed and the responses entered into a database (www.apre.info [no longer active]). The responses were evaluated against the APRE working hypothesis which states that:  a) to be successful, a hatchery program must be internally consistent with its own stated purpose and externally consistent with the goals and priorities of the environment, including other potentially affected fish populations; and b) almost any human intervention to manipulate the environment poses some level of risk to the existing environment and species.  A hatchery program was judged to be successful if it met the following four major conditions:

  1. It must produce a healthy and viable hatchery population.
  2. It must make a sustainable contribution of adult returns to conservation and/or harvest.
  3. Its potential effects on wild and native populations and the environment must be understood.
  4. It must collect, record, evaluate, and disseminate information pertaining to the first three conditions so that decision-makers may be informed about the benefits and risks of the program relative to other means of achieving similar conservation and harvest goals.

The information database is intended to form the foundation for continuing consideration of artificial production in the Basin. The individual program reports contain a summary of facility information including operator, funding sources, and overall performance. The database is designed to be updated as new information becomes available and hatchery reforms are enacted.

The results of the APRE are examined in 6 major categories:  fish stocks, hatchery operations, distribution of hatchery releases, hatchery goals and purposes, funding, and monitoring and evaluation.

  • Fish Stocks:  The study identified 512 fish stocks of which 250 were natural stocks and 262 were hatchery stocks. Of the hatchery stocks identified, 174 were anadromous salmonid programs, 66 were resident salmonid programs and 23 non-salmonid programs. The largest portion of stocks was found in the Lower Columbia province.
  • Hatchery Operation:  About half of the anadromous salmonid hatchery programs in the Lower Columbia are segregated; most in the upper river are integrated programs.
  • Hatchery Practices:  Many segregated hatchery programs contribute significantly to wild spawning populations, despite the intention to separate hatchery and wild fish. The amount of mixing was unknown in a third of segregated programs.  In addition, 31 percent used non-local broodstock and 75 percent transferred in fish from outside the basin or released fish outside the stream system. In contrast, 93 percent of integrated programs used broodstock derived from within the subbasin and 92 percent avoided transfers from outside the basin or avoided releasing fish outside the stream system.
  • Distribution of Hatchery Releases:  Hatchery managers reported planned, as opposed to actual, releases of 172,162,986 juvenile fish of all species in the U.S. portion of the Columbia River Basin. Of these releases, 156,737,635 fish are planned releases of anadromous salmonids below the fish passage barriers at the Chief Joseph and Hells Canyon dams. The largest proportion (50 percent) occurs in the Lower Columbia provinces to provide fish for the ocean and lower river commercial fisheries.
  • Goals and Purpose:  For anadromous salmonids, harvest remains the primary purpose for hatchery programs in the Columbia River Basin.
  • Funding:  Identification of hatchery funding is a complex issue because most programs are funded from a variety of direct and indirect sources. The Lower Columbia Province has the most funding because it has the majority of programs.
  • Monitoring and Evaluation: Monitoring and evaluation consists primarily of reports of typical fish statistics such as number of recruits per spawner, smolt-to-adult survival, escapement, and total catch. Even so, many programs did not collect information for any of these categories. Information for anadromous salmonid programs regarding the number of recruits per spawner collected was available for less than 10 percent of programs, smolt-to-adult survival data was available for 53 percent of the programs, 23 percent of programs had data for escapement and 35 percent of programs had catch data.

The APRE was designed to address concerns that the Columbia River Basin hatchery system needed to be reformed. The study applied hatchery reform principles developed by the HSRG to the information received from the fishery and hatchery managers. These principles included the following:

  • Goals for stocks affected by hatcheries must be clearly articulated, expressed in terms of resource values, and reflective of current biological, economic, and cultural circumstances.
  • Hatchery programs must be scientifically defensible.
  • Decision-making about hatchery programming and operations must be responsive and well-informed.

When these principles were applied, a number of questions arose about artificial production within the Basin. These questions explored such issues as whether or not hatchery programs can be used more strategically to better accommodate ecological and social goals and how many hatchery fish should be released each year. Broad answers to these questions were formulated and used to arrive at the general conclusions of the study:

  • Hatcheries are limited in what they can accomplish.
  • The social, economic, and ecological purposes upon which the current hatchery programs were established have changed and will continue to change.
  • Hatcheries will continue to play a part in recovery and management of fish in the Columbia River and elsewhere.
  • Hatcheries require reform to align their policies and practices with current social priorities and scientific knowledge, to determine hatchery performance, and to operate in a business-like fashion.

This document will be the basis for an issues paper which will delineate the Council's approach to hatchery reform. Both the Basin-Level report and the issues paper will contribute to a Report to Congress.

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Related links:

  • Report to Congress
  • Draft report and comments
Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement