council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting June 10 - 11, 2025 in Missoula › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2024
WED
06
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
THU
07
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
NOV 2024
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
NOV 2024
THU
21
1:00 pm—2:00 pm
Resource Cost Framework in Power Plan Webinar
NOV 2024
FRI
22
9:30 am—11:30 am
Fuels Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
MON
02
11:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Appendix B to report CR96-26: Statements of Steering Committee Members

regarding the final report of the Comprehensive Review of the Northwest Energy System

Council Document Number: 
CR 96-26B
Published date: 
Dec. 12, 1996
Document state: 
Published

Al Alexanderson, Portland General Electric
Rick Applegate, Trout Unlimited
Ken Canon, Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities
Jim Curtis, Bonneville Power Administration
Jim Davis, Douglas County Public Utility District
William Drummond, Western Montana Generation and Transmission
Jason Eisdorfer, Citizens Utility Board
Bob Gannon, Montana Power Company
K.C. Golden, Washington Department of Community Trade and Economic Development
Charles Hedemark, Intermountain Gas Company
Sharon Nelson, Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission
John Saven, Northwest Requirements Utilities
Rachel Shimshak, Renewable Northwest Project
Brett Wilcox, Northwest Aluminum Company
Gary Zarker, Seattle City Light

Al Alexanderson, Portland General Electric

The Comprehensive Review has provided an opportunity for the Northwest to both meet its environmental obligations and continue to receive the long-term benefits of a reliable power supply. The Review helped forge important agreements about preserving and sharing these benefits in the region.

The governors have helped the region develop a road map for restructuring the Northwest Power industry. We are moving from a closed and largely government-controlled electric industry to one based on competition and driven by customer choice of what to buy and from whom. The road map will help get us there in an equitable way.

Rick Applegate, Trout Unlimited

The Steering Committee's recommendations have now been submitted to the governors. And, some important progress was made. Nonetheless, as my dissent reflects, there is significantly more work to do before consensus on these important power and fish-related issues can be achieved. Without that consensus, it will be difficult if not impossible to implement the Steering Committee's recommendations on utility restructuring.

The next critical step is to address fish and wildlife concerns – including the issue whether this proposal improves the ability of the power system to meet its unmet fish and wildlife obligations. That must be done in expeditious deliberations with the tribal state and federal sovereigns and fishery advocates – not just an individual consultation or two. Ultimately, our real legacy will be the effectiveness of our response to the plight of the Columbia River salmon steelhead and trout.

Ken Canon, Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities

The governors' review addressed the competitive changes sweeping the electricity industry in a comprehensive fashion. Industrial electricity customers support this important effort to move the electric industry towards competition at all levels and for all customers.

The review's recommendations are future oriented, comprehensive and pragmatic. The review is an important step in the transition to a more customer-focused, competitive electric future that will provide all electric users with additional choices.

Jim Curtis, Bonneville Power Administration

BPA's structure may change as an ultimate result of the Regional Review, but its purpose and role within the Columbia River System was reaffirmed. Our mission continues to be to meet our public responsibilities to the people of the Pacific Northwest and the nation's taxpayers through commercially successful power and transmission enterprises. A common desire to preserve the value of the federal hydropower system for the Northwest united all of the participants in the review process.

Jim Davis, Douglas County Public Utility District

The Comprehensive Review's work respects local control of electricity decision-making while taking important steps to prepare the Northwest for increased competition in the electricity industry.

The recommendations balance the need to protect the environment and public purposes with the interests of the US Treasury, the Washington Public Power Supply System bondholders and utility customers, thereby, recognizing that it is not in the best interests of the Northwest to force the utility customers away from BPA by imposing too many onerous requirements.

William Drummond, Western Montana Generation and Transmission

With all the radical changes going on in the electrical energy business, the governors asked us to make recommendations for channeling these changes in the direction that would best serve Northwest residents. While educating people about these changes, our report provides a structure for preserving the benefits of our power system for the region, allows people to make choices and preserves public purpose values.

Our plan is only a beginning; lots of work remains especially at the state level. Also, two of the most important elements are still unresolved. While the future benefits of the Northwest's hydro system could be huge, right not it would take very little effort to drive the system to insolvency. Second, we have to do something about governance of the Columbia River and the costs of fish and wildlife recovery. Until those issues are resolved, there is little certainty about whether there will be any benefits to share.

Jason Eisdorfer, Citizens Utility Board

The residential and small business customer may have more freas than hopes concenrning the outcome of electricity industry deregulation. The Comprehensive Review is a rational step toward providing these customers protections and benefits in the new deregulated environment. The report links open acces to electricity suppliers with protections for small customers and firm funding for programs important to citizens of the Northwest such as conservation, renewable resources and low-income energy assistance.

The Comprehensive Review made movement toward assuring that the benefits of the federal hydro system stay in the region and that the Bonneville Power Administration meets is debt repayment to the Federal Treasury. The Steering Comittee accomplished its task as charged by the governor. The residents of the Northwest hope that the governors use the momentum of this energy review to move to address the salmon recovery issue, which is the other half of the Northwest energy equation.

Bob Gannon, Montana Power Company

The recommendations represent a hard-won consensus of widely diverse interests. They provide for a transition that enables the region to preserve benefits of the regional energy system for Northwest consumers, enables customers choice through an efficient competitive market, and preserves the region's leadership position in acquisition of public purpose benefits.

The movement of various parties' positions, from self-interest to regional best interests, demonstrated the significant strength of the steering committee process. The recommendations provide a mechanism to retain benefits for the region's ratepayers, provide them with choice, and preserve acquisition of public purposes.

K.C. Golden, Washington Department of Community Trade and Economic Development

These recommendations are a package that can unite the region around a common strategy for managing the Columbia River System and for delivering a brighter energy future. By working together as a region, we were able to seize some of our most promising opportunities and meet some of our toughest challenges.

The review recognized the value of vital investments in energy efficiency, renewable resources, and affordable low-income services, and it provided meaningful guidance on a practical, competitively neutral method for securing them. Our recommendations set forth an appropriate minimum standard for these investments. Now, working together in the four states, we'll need to set up effective mechanisms that allow us to meet those standards in all cases, and exceed them where possible.

As the report acknowledges, we will not have a truly comprehensive package without a parallel set of initiatives on salmon recovery and river governance. The imminence of important changes in the energy system creates a uniquely promising moment to move forward simultaneously toward a biologically sound and regionally supported recovery effort. Without such movement, the consensus we need in order to sustain a solution that meet's the region's long term interests will prove elusive.

Charles Hedemark, Intermountain Gas Company

The recommendations represent a responsible effort by the Northwest to address essential questions about the future of our region's federal system resources. The review opened energy decision making to a wide spectrum of participants, while preserving the federal energy system's benefits for the citizens of the region.

One of the most important outcomes of the review is the recommendation that all distribution utilities accommodate open market access for all consumers by mid-1999. The review's recommendations provide general guidance to the legislative and regulatory authorities who must now pick up the work the governor's committee has begun. Balancing the advantages of an open and competitive market for electricity with the benefits of the past is what Comprehensive Review was all about.

Sharon Nelson, Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission

The review's recommendations on changes to the structure of the industry encourage effective and beneficial competition and represent real progress. While retail competition will be a matter of state and local policy-making, the recommendations make a contribution by raising these issues for consideration by local decision makers.

The transition from monopoly service to an electricity industry controlled by the choices of consumers should lead to greater efficiency and both short and long term benefits to all consumers. The steering committee's recommendations concerning transmission, federal power marketing, public purposes, and retail competition move the transition forward in a responsible and constructive manner.

John Saven, Northwest Requirements Utilities

The review was an initial "test" of whether the region has the fortitude to develop a cohesive plan for the future, or whether we would end up responding to events in a fragmented manner. We clearly passed the test. The review helped the Northwest stake out a future that meets the needs of customers while fulfilling our responsibilities for environmental stewardship.

Rachel Shimshak, Renewable Northwest Project

The review also made significant progress on the development of a secure, competitively neutral funding mechanism to continue conservation, renewable resources, and low income energy service programs, investment as the energy system evolves toward competition. The recommendation represent a good starting point for ensuring a clean and efficient electricity system.

Brett Wilcox, Northwest Aluminum Company

The report recognizes that the electric power industry is being deregulated, that kilowatt hours are basically a commodity, and that a competitive market for electric power as a commodity – wholesale and retail – is not only inevitable but beneficial, because it will result in lower prices.

The report is important because Congress will take up legislation to restructure the electric power industry nationwide, just as Congress restructured the telecommunications industry. The Northwest consensus represented by the report is a workable new structure for the Northwest power system, including BPA.

Gary Zarker, Seattle City Light

The report reflects a lot of hard work and tough compromises among the many differing interests in the Pacific Northwest. The report will help ensure the public benefits and the economic and environmental advantages of the Columbia River system are maintained for the people of the Northwest. The review will help protect our quality of life, the cost and reliability of electricity and the influence we have as a region over these issues.

< back to CR96-26

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement