Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations F&W Program Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting October 11 - 12, 2023 in Redmond › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
MON
05
1:30 pm—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
DEC 2022
TUE
06
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
WED
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
FEB 2023
WED
22
2:00 pm—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources/Demand Response Adv Comm Combined Meeting
FEB 2023
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
FRI
24
9:00 am—2:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Comm.
MAR 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2023
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2023
THU
23
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Technical Committee
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting June 21, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
FRI
14
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2023
THU
20
9:00 am—3:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
05
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
THU
21
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Governors Report and Future Reporting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE
24
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
OCT 2023
THU
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Flat Funding
NOV 2023
WED
01
9:30 am—4:00 pm
Reserves in Power Planning Workshop
NOV 2023
THU
02
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JAN 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
FEB 2024
TUE WED
06 - 07
Council Meeting
MAR 2024
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
MAY 2024
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2024
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
AUG 2024
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
OCT 2024
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeteing
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Follow-up Review of Idaho Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Projects

Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-IDFG (Project 1992-061-03) and Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation (Project 1995-057-00)

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2017-9
Published date: 
Aug. 31, 2017
Document state: 
Published

Share

In response to the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s August 22, 2017 request, the ISRP reviewed a cover letter and supporting documents from Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) to address the ISRP’s concerns with two IDFG projects: Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation-IDFG (project 1992-061-03) and Southern Idaho Wildlife Mitigation (project 1995-057-00). In its 2017 Final Wildlife Project Review, the ISRP found the projects did not meet scientific review criteria because the project summary and response did not demonstrate that the projects had adequate plans for individual mitigation parcels, quantifiable biological objectives, monitoring protocols to assess progress toward objectives, or an adaptive management framework (ISRP 2017-7).

ISRP Recommendation and Summary Comments

Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)

IDFG is implementing a state-wide, long-term habitat monitoring program for its Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs), and it is commendable that IDFG has given thought to desired endpoints for habitat types and associated monitoring on their WMAs. Nonetheless, the ISRP recommends consideration of further improvements. The following concerns should be addressed before the next ISRP review:

  1. Objectives. IDFG’s draft Statewide Wildlife Management Area Habitat Monitoring Implementation Plan and Techniques Guide (Appendix A) presents generic objectives for the five habitat types found on its WMAs. Although these all-purpose objectives represent a good start, they are inconsistent across habitat types. Some provide simplified quantitative goals with timelines (e.g., wetlands), while others describe desired habitat conditions (e.g., forested habitat). The draft guide needs to be modified to provide consistent objectives for all five habitat types. Additionally, we urge IDFG to use these generic objectives as starting points for specific quantitative and time-explicit objectives that can be applied to parcels within individual WMAs. Quantitative and time-specific objectives will enable managers to ascertain via monitoring if desired habitat responses are being accomplished and will facilitate adaptive management.
  2. Vegetation and wildlife response monitoring. Currently the proposed goals, objectives, and monitoring methods focus exclusively on vegetative responses to management actions. It is important to recognize that the ultimate purpose of improving or maintaining plant communities on WMA lands is to benefit wildlife (e.g., deer, elk, song birds, waterfowl, etc.). Consequently, we encourage IDFG to measure wildlife species responses to their management actions whenever possible. It is not anticipated that wildlife monitoring could occur at all the mitigation parcels but could potentially occur for large mitigation parcels or entire WMAs. Wildlife responses along with vegetative assessments will help determine the effectiveness of management actions and prioritize future work efforts.
  3. Monitoring methods. Out-of-date methods (e.g., analysis of diversity) and errors in recommended statistical analyses are evident in some parts of the appendices. The appendices should be thoroughly reviewed by outside experts and modified to assure appropriate analytical methods are prescribed in the guide. If IDFG and the Council request, the ISRP would be pleased to review future drafts of the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) plan/guide.
  4. Adaptive management. When the state-wide management plan is completed, IDFG will have an M&E plan and elements of adaptive management. However, there does not appear to be an explicit adaptive management framework. For example, for the Boise River WMA (p 21), IDFG states, “adaptive management will be implemented through…” followed by a monitoring schedule. There is no indication of how the monitoring data will be analyzed or used to guide future management. Consequently, a specific decision-making process needs to be incorporated into the management plans for each WMA along with a description of how monitoring data will be analyzed and used to guide future management. In summary, we recommend that the adaptive management process include:
  • Hypotheses and mechanisms to guide decision making
  • Quantitative objectives with scientifically credible rationales that define what is to be achieved and when
  • Monitoring protocols and metrics that are shown to be appropriate – and evenly applied across habitat types – for examining if quantitative objectives have been attained
  • An appropriate data management and analysis strategy designed to handle the volume and diversity of data expected.
Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
ISRPIdaho Department of Fish and Game

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2023

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions