Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting April 11 - 12, 2023 in (Webinar) › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
27
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—12:45 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
10
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
30
9:00 am—11:00 am
F&W Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
31
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2022
MON
12
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE
20
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Tech Committee
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2022
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE
11
9:00 am—1:00 pm
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2022
THU
03
9:30 am—3:30 pm
GENESYS Technical Conference (SAAC/RAAC Combined)
NOV 2022
TUE
08
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Technical/Steering Comm Meetings
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
MON
05
1:30 pm—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
DEC 2022
TUE
06
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
WED
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
FEB 2023
WED
22
2:00 pm—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources/Demand Response Adv Comm Combined Meeting
FEB 2023
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
FRI
24
9:00 am—2:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Comm.
MAR 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2023
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2023
THU
23
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Technical Committee
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED THU
21 - 22
RTF Meeting June 21-22, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

ISAB Review of the Comparative Survival Study (CSS) Draft 2022 Annual Report

Council Document Number: 
ISAB 2022-1
Published date: 
Oct. 18, 2022
Document state: 
Published

Share

The Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program calls for a regular system of independent and timely science reviews of the Fish Passage Center’s (FPC) analytical products. These reviews include evaluations of the Comparative Survival Study’s (CSS) draft annual reports. This ISAB review of the draft 2022 CSS Annual Report is the ISAB’s thirteenth review of CSS annual reports. CSS reports have thoroughly documented trends in survival and productivity, and these long-term data become more valuable with each additional year.

The annual CSS report is a mature product, produced by the Fish Passage Center since 1998 and reviewed by the ISAB since 2010. The reports typically include mostly updates with the latest year of data, continuation of the analysis of long-term trends, and addition of new analytical approaches. As more data are acquired, new patterns and questions arise on the interpretation of the results—this is now the primary focus of the ISAB's reviews.

A few key observations and suggestions for future analyses and reporting from this year’s ISAB review include:

  • The ISAB previously encouraged the CSS to describe major applications of the CSS data that have been published or reported over the last year and briefly highlight important findings based on CSS data. The ISAB continues to recommend that the CSS should make the regional importance of its analyses abundantly clear to the Council, BPA, co-managers, and the public.
  • In 2021, the ISAB suggested a description of important changes in the hydrosystem over the years and a brief indication of their possible effects on salmonid survival. In response, the CSS developed a new chapter (Chapter 7) for the 2022 Annual Report that provides a thorough and readable account of the history of the hydrosystem, development of management of spill to benefit salmon and steelhead, and the formation and evolution of the CSS study to inform state, federal, and tribal fisheries managers.
  • While well beyond the scope of the CSS, the ISAB suggests that summary chapters similar to Chapter 7 be written for hatchery operations; for habitat restoration; for avian predation; for seal and sea lion predation, and such to keep a summary record of major changes to the basin in one easily accessible place. These could be commissioned work by other lead entities with expertise in those areas.
  • In Chapter 2, the CSS Oversight Committee presents an Adaptive Management Framework as a response to proposals for Spill Experiments (Chapter 2). This is the first evaluation of the Flex Spill experiment that appears in CSS annual reports. Complete returns of tagged cohorts are not yet available, but initial results for (FTT) and in-river survival indicate these observations appear consistent with modelled values based on 1998-2018 data, but no formal assessment is done. Analyses to date indicate that spill levels that result in up to 125% TDG, or perhaps even greater, would not decrease juvenile survival. The ISAB encourages the CSS to conduct analyses now, even with incomplete data, and offers suggestions for additional improvements in data analysis and the use of results to inform the adaptive management process.
  • Chapter 3 continues and expands previous years’ work on the effects of the in-river environment on juvenile travel time and survival. The CSS now analyzes the Upper Columbia River based on PIT tag data from Rocky Reach to McNary dams rather than Rock Island to McNary dams.
  • Chapter 4 also continues and extends past years’ work on patterns in annual overall SARs. By now, the low level of SARs relative to the Council’s 2%-6% objectives has been established. The CSS could consider developing an Impact Report, perhaps developed collectively with other groups, to communicate the most critical take-home messages and implications for the Council, BPA, and co-managers.
  • Chapter 5 presents analysis of upstream migration success for adult spring and summer Chinook, fall Chinook, and steelhead. All survival probability estimates are very high, with two segments having survival estimates very close to 1.0. The ISAB is concerned that the lack of contrast in survival in many reaches over time will make it difficult to determine effects of other factors. What are the major management implications from these results?
  • The premise and motivation for Chapter 6 make it a great addition to the annual report. The link between SARs and abundance targets is fundamental to understanding what restoration and other recovery-related actions must achieve to be successful. The analyses are designed to address the question: “What level of SAR is needed to realize the Columbia Basin Partnership (CBP) benchmarks, and is that level of SAR consistent with the prescribed NPCC goals?” In addressing this question, the analyses also provide a synthetic view of the status of the situation for an impaired population (i.e., Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon).
  • In Chapter 6, the data are examined with a multiple model analysis designed to increase confidence (robustness) when different models (approaches) agree. However, without careful examination of the assumptions and the details of how common data are used across the models, it is impossible to assess the degree to which the predictions from the three approaches are independent. It is clear that the three models are not independent. The assumptions and sources for key inputs are insufficiently documented to assess their commonalities. Approaches 2 and 3 might be better presented as alternatives of the same approach.
  • The current version of Chapter 6 needs additional work to explain the three approaches clearly and to resolve the issues identified in our detailed review. Nevertheless, the main message is that substantially larger SARs than the 2%-6% recommended ranges from the CSS reports will be needed to meet the recovery goals. The need to address these management questions should be highlighted in a Conclusions section for the Council and regional decision makers. The many years of CSS reporting should provide valuable information on how to prioritize management actions.
  • Chapter 7 summarizes how spill has changed since the completion of the hydroelectric projects in the early 1980s. The ISAB appreciates the difficulty in summarizing spill changes that have occurred on many different temporal scales, and we found this high-level summary very informative. The chapter emphasizes that relatively small changes in spill occurred during the Spill Experiment over a period with high variation in river discharge and ocean conditions. The ISAB encourages the CSS to give this conclusion more prominence because of the many conflicting arguments about the need to change spill over the years.
  • As we stated in our review of the 2021 CSS Report, the ISAB strongly emphasizes the importance of the CSS reports. Survival of salmon and steelhead during their life cycle is significantly affected by the hydrosystem, and these data are essential for the Fish and Wildlife Program. The ISAB encourages the Council and BPA to reassess the funding and consequences of flat funding since 2017. This funding policy directly affects the quality of the research and integrity of the long-term records. If funding is to be constrained, then the entire CSS program should be reviewed in detail to assess which parts are essential and which parts can be reduced without critically damaging the overall CSS program.

The ISAB appreciates the CSS’s careful consideration and detailed responses to suggestions provided in previous reviews. The ISAB’s full report contains an overview of the draft 2022 CSS report’s findings, suggested topics for further CSS review, and general comments and specific editorial suggestions on each chapter of the draft 2022 CSS report.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Fish Passage CenterSalmon and SteelheadColumbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife ProgramMonitoring and EvaluationColumbia River SalmonIndependent Scientific Advisory BoardDam Passage SurvivalSpillISABComparative Survival StudyLife-cycle Model

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions