council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting June 10 - 11, 2025 in Missoula › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2024
WED
06
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
THU
07
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
NOV 2024
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
NOV 2024
THU
21
1:00 pm—2:00 pm
Resource Cost Framework in Power Plan Webinar
NOV 2024
FRI
22
9:30 am—11:30 am
Fuels Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
MON
02
11:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

ISAB Review of the Comparative Survival Study (CSS) Draft 2024 Annual Report

Council Document Number: 
ISAB 2024-3
Published date: 
Oct. 19, 2024
Document state: 
Published

The Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program calls for a regular system of independent and timely science reviews of the (FPC) analytical products. These reviews include evaluations of the draft annual reports for the Comparative Survival Study (CSS). This ISAB review of the is the ISAB’s fifteenth review of CSS annual reports.

The Fish Passage Center has developed a valuable long-term database on the hydrological performance of the hydrosystem and its effects on salmon and steelhead survival during their seaward migration as juveniles, at sea, and during their upstream migration as returning adults based on detections of salmon tagged as smolts (e.g., smolt-to-adult return: SAR). The CSS reports since 1998 summarize the trends and provide analyses of the effects of the hydrosystem on salmon, steelhead, and other species in the Columbia River Basin. ISAB reviews from 2010 to the present have critically evaluated the analyses in the CSS reports and made suggestions for improved methods, interpretations, and presentation of results.

The annual CSS report is a mature product, typically including updates of analyses using the latest year of data and expansion of analyses when data are sufficient. As more data are acquired, some new patterns may emerge. The passing years may also bring scientific advances and perspectives, leading to new conclusions, and these are now the primary focus of the ISAB’s reviews.

Major findings and regional issues identified in this year’s ISAB review that warrant attention and potential decisions and actions include:

  • Heterogeneity and Factors that Influence Smolt-to-Adult Return Proportions

Chapter 6 is an omnibus analysis of the relationship between SARs and covariates. An empirical logistic regression analysis was conducted of SARs versus water transit time (WTT), and an index of powerhouse encounters (PITPH) for Chinook and steelhead was combined with random effects for group and year. Several models were fit and ranked using information criteria. However, all of the models assumed simple additivity between the factors (e.g., the incremental effect of water transit time was the same for both species). Additional models should be fit to investigate if the incremental effects of WTT and PITHP are the same for both species. Additionally, the effects of other possible explanatory variables (e.g., marine phase-related, freshwater habitat-related, migration dimensions), in addition to WTT and PITPH, are known and their effects should also be considered in the model building.

  • Influence of Flow Augmentation from the Snake River above Brownlee Reservoir on Salmon and Steelhead Survival

Chapter 7 examines the efficacy of flow augmentation. Only small effects on the hydrosystem were detected, so it is not surprising that there was little evidence of an overall effect on fish survival. However, flow augmentation may be beneficial under certain conditions (e.g., low flow years), so further analyses are needed to investigate its effects under different hydrological conditions and when salmon are scarce (i.e., if even relatively small benefits could benefit the population’s status).

  • Estimating Powerhouse Passage Proportions at Hydropower Dams

Chapter 8 is a useful addition to the previous chapter of the 2022 CSS Report that describes the history of the hydrosystem, development of management of spill to benefit salmon and steelhead, and the formation and evolution of the CSS study to inform state, federal, and tribal fisheries managers. The ISAB notes some concerns about the use of some water gaging stations. This new chapter, and the chapter from the 2023 report on the history of the hydrosystem development, are valuable foundations for readers of the CSS reports, especially those without extensive prior knowledge of the system. Perhaps these types of chapters could be combined into a single document that is available as “background” on the CSS for future readers.

Suggested Topics for Further Review

Since 2011, the ISAB has suggested topics that warrant further CSS or regional review. The ISAB offers the following suggestions based on this year’s review:

  1. Coho salmon is notably missing from the list of stocks and numbers of years of data. Although largely absent in the formative years of the CSS, hatchery and rewilded coho salmon are becoming an important part of the mix of stocks and species being studied. The CSS should consider including coho salmon (e.g., in the PIT tagging effort and reporting) to help understand the dynamics of success of the large reintroduction effort in the mid and upper Columbia River, and the potential for inter-specific effects on other salmonid populations as coho salmon become more abundant.
  2. Last year, the ISAB recommended that the CSS consider how to incorporate the influence of climate-related and density-dependent factors on the marine survival of Columbia River salmon in future reports. In 2023, we emphasized that: 

    “In addition to concerns about SARs, from 2008 to 2022, an average of 74% of adult Snake River Chinook salmon migrating upstream past Bonneville Dam survived to Lower Granite Dam, but in the warm year of 2015, only 52% of the adults survived from Bonneville to Lower Granite. The frequency of warm years is likely to increase in the future under climate change, and the survival of adults may decrease more than recent averages illustrate. The collective ongoing poor survival of Columbia River salmon and steelhead warrants a comprehensive assessment of the long-term consequences of these trends and consideration of likely scenarios of climate change and warming.”

    The CSS did not respond to this recommendation, which the ISAB repeats, emphasizing that juvenile Fish Travel Time (FTT) and Ordinal Day are strongly related to temperature and flow and are likely to be affected by changing climate. With lower flow (or increased WTT), the time spent feeding in or migrating through warmer water may increase and affect growth rates, thermal stress, and forage community composition. Similarly, Ordinal Day may reflect seasonal temperature and hydrological profiles which can also affect growth, stress, and diet (among other effects). Such indirect effects on survival and productivity warrant greater consideration.
  3. In 2023, the ISAB concluded that continued analysis of the benefits, uncertainties, and risks of breaching the lower Snake River dams is warranted and suggested that a more comprehensive effort to predict responses to simulate the complex ecological responses expected after breaching is needed. We suggested that the analyses could include scenarios for the geomorphic and environmental conditions after dam removal and evaluate additional sources of uncertainty (e.g., implementation uncertainty, realism of existing models for no-dam conditions) under present-day and plausible future (climate change) environmental conditions. We encourage the CSS to revisit our suggestion from the review of the 2023 CSS report on breaching by examining lessons learned from Klamath dam removals, which were removed this year, and other dam removals in the region. Information on the geomorphic, hydrologic, water quality, and ecological responses will soon be available for the CSS to expand their modeling analysis of breaching presented in Chapter 6 of the 2023 CSS Report.
  4. If analyses are preformed that involve a priori selection of specific and limited explanatory variables, the description of the methods should clearly describe why those variables were selected and the implications of their use for the results and interpretation. For example, in Chapter 6 only WTT and PITPH were included in statistical models of SARs even though other variables are important and available for inclusion. The limited variable models did not predict SAR values well yet were extensively interpreted for the importance of WTT and PITPH. The rationale for such analyses needs to be clearly stated and, in some cases, additional models that include more explanatory variables should be considered.
  5. Consider expanding certain analyses (e.g., SARs in Chapter 6 and benefits of flow augmentation in Chapter 7) to sockeye salmon. This is understandably a long-term objective. With the recent increases in sockeye salmon abundance, it would be wise to get prepared to do such analyses.
  6. Some analyses would benefit from further resolution of the ocean phase (e.g., Chapter 6 on SARs), analyses of flows to include the lower estuary (Chapter 8 on WTTs), and decomposing results into year-types to more fully understand the robustness of general patterns (Chapter 7 on flow augmentation).
  7. There is an agreement in principle between Canada and the United States for the Columbia River Treaty, but details are not yet available on the effects on the hydrosystem. The ISAB recommends that, when information is available on the details of the Treaty, the CSS should analyze the likely effects of the revised treaty on passage and survival metrics based on observed responses in the system to date.

Importance of Information in CSS Reports

The ISAB strongly emphasizes the importance of the CSS reports for effectively monitoring and evaluating salmon co-management and hydrosystem operation. There may be a tendency to consider the annual CSS reports to be just “more of the same” each year. With more than 26 years of data, the conclusions reached are now extremely valuable because the uncertainties in the results can be well estimated and outlier years can be identified. Moreover, annual data collection and analysis updating can play a “sentinel” role by permitting a standardized detection of changes within a contemporary period. The physical (e.g., PIT tag detection arrays) and human capacity and expertise added over the 26 years are extremely valuable, and the CSS annual reports provide an effective and useful resource to many involved with the Columbia Basin.

Long-term records of fish abundance and environmental conditions are extremely difficult and expensive to develop. The survival of salmon and steelhead during parts of their life cycle is affected by the hydrosystem, and these data are essential for the Fish and Wildlife Program. This is particularly critical when assessing years with extreme conditions, such as low flows, warm temperatures, or other atypical seasonal patterns. Such cases, at the edges of the distributions, are likely to occur more often under climate change, and a long-time series is needed to capture enough of these uncommon conditions to make reliable assessments. Collection of important data from some sections of the Columbia River has been limited, interrupted, or eliminated in recent years. Critical needs include extending PIT-tag trawl sampling in the lower river through August, increasing the number of PIT-tagged fish, and enhancing detection probabilities at the dams.

The ISAB appreciates the CSS’s detailed responses to suggestions provided in previous reviews, and we do not expect the CSS to necessarily respond immediately to new requests for further analyses. The ISAB’s full report includes an overview of the latest report’s findings, suggested topics for further CSS review, and general comments and editorial comments on each chapter of the draft 2024 CSS Annual Report.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Fish TaggingFish PassageSalmon and SteelheadMonitoring and EvaluationColumbia River SalmonResearchHydrosystemDam Passage SurvivalISABCSSComparative Survival StudyLife-cycle Model

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement