Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Natural Gas Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum
  • Resource Strategies Advisory Committee (Not Active)

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

Energy Forums and Workgroups

  • Pacific NW Demand Response Project
  • Northwest Wind Integration Forum (Archive)
Meetings
See next Council Meeting June 14 - 15, 2022 in Portland › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
AUG 2021
WED FRI
04 - 06
RAAC/SAAC - Adequacy/GENESYS Technical Conference
AUG 2021
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
AUG 2021
MON
23
1:00 pm—2:30 pm
Council Meeting Webinar to Discuss the Draft 2021 Power Plan and Decision to Release for Public Review and Comment
AUG 2021
TUE
31
9:00 am—2:45 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
SEP 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE
21
10:00 am—11:00 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE WED
21 - 22
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
27
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Montana
SEP 2021
WED
29
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
07
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Washington
OCT 2021
TUE
12
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Oregon
OCT 2021
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
14
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Idaho
OCT 2021
TUE
19
9:30 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
09
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
30
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
DEC 2021
TUE WED
07 - 08
RTF Meeting
DEC 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—11:00 am
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
DEC 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
WED
19
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
JAN 2022
TUE
25
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation: January 25, 2022
JAN 2022
WED
26
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2022
FRI
28
8:30 am—11:30 am
Power Committee Meeting
FEB 2022
MON
14
9:00 am—10:30 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
FEB 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
FEB 2022
WED
23
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—3:00 pm
System Integration Forum: Scope of Work on Potential Lower Snake River Dam Analysis
MAR 2022
TUE
08
1:30 pm—2:30 pm
Public Affairs Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
MON TUE
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2022
FRI
18
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
30
9:30 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE WED
10 - 11
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
MAY 2022
WED
18
Council Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE
24
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
08
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2022
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2022
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED THU
06 - 07
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
20 - 21
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE
08
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
06 - 07
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

ISRP Follow-up Review of the Upper Columbia United Tribes’ Monitoring and Evaluation Program (#2008-007-00)

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2018-7
Published date: 
Sept. 7, 2018
Document state: 
Published

Share

At the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s July 17, 2018 request, the ISRP reviewed a response from the Upper Columbia United Tribes for Project #2008-007-00, Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT) Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Program. The UCUT’s response is intended to address the Council’s recommendation from the 2017 Wildlife Category Review which incorporated the ISRP’s recommendation of “meets scientific review criteria (qualified)” (ISRP 2017-7, pages 22-26).

The ISRP’s qualification:

The project proponents agreed to submit a progress report for ISRP review in 2018. The report should:

  1. provide detailed responses to the ISRP’s eight questions from the preliminary review
  2. describe the status of updating management plans to include quantitative biological objectives for each representative cover type, and
  3. describe what a restored habitat looks like relative to the reference conditions.

As requested, the UCUT provided a progress report and a response to eight questions from our preliminary review. The ISRP appreciates the timely submittal of these documents and thoughtful responses. Although the documents address most of our qualifications and questions, some fundamental questions are not fully addressed. Consequently, the ISRP continues to recommend “meets scientific review criteria (qualified).”

The program provides a reasonable approach to assessing large-scale, long-term mitigation efforts. Although the ISRP provides specific comments for improvements to project methods in the full review memo, overall, the ISRP finds that the UCUT M&E program’s methods are scientifically sound.

The primary reason for the continuing “Qualification” from the earlier ISRP review is that the UCUT submission does not address Qualification 2: Status of updating management plans to include quantitative biological objectives for each representative cover type. The regional M&E program still needs to demonstrate that it will deliver data that enable assessments of progress toward quantitative biological objectives for individual Tribal restoration projects, ones that ultimately lead to improved actions that benefit wildlife. Adaptive management cannot occur until specific quantitative biological objectives are established.

The ISRP recognizes that quantitative objectives and adaptive management plans are best developed at the project level by the Tribal managers. However, there also needs to be coordination between development of individual property plans and the regional M&E program. This will ensure that needed information is being collected and evaluated. In their 2017 response to the ISRP’s preliminary comments, the UCUT indicated that: “The UCUT member tribes plan to meet extensively with the UWMEP principal investigators over the next 6 months to develop comprehensive QBO (Quantitative Biological Objectives) from each cover type from the existing reference site data as descriptors of Desired Future Conditions (DFC).” We also urge them to work collaboratively to develop adaptive management plans that include scheduled interim assessments for their individual restoration actions. We emphasize that special consideration will be needed to ensure that the M&E program is collecting information that can be incorporated into Tribal adaptive management processes. The ISRP is concerned that management actions could continue indefinitely with little or no detectable changes in approaches or results over time because the UCUT M&E plan does not fully mesh with the biological objectives of specific projects. Consequently, applied management actions by an individual Tribe may be useful but may also be a sub-optimal use of funds.

Example objectives include:

  • A biological objective may be to restore ecological features needed for re-establishment of amphibians within 10 years after restoration is initiated. However, does the UCUT M&E plan collect the appropriate data to assess such an objective?
  • For reforestation actions, an objective may be based on stems/ha of suitable trees at specific time intervals after restoration. Objectives need to be based on site productivity information and on rates of succession. They should not be statements of unsupported desired outcomes. Will the current UCUT M&E plan gather information on stem density or solely on community-structure of vegetation?
  • A biological objective may be based on general successional paths known for many ecological regions. Does the UCUT M&E plan to collect information on these successional paths? What are the key indicator species and their abundance and/or distribution that need to be monitored to ensure restoration is proceeding?
  • If a current restoration action has the potential to introduce invasive species, does the UCUT M&E plan collect the necessary information to assess species invasions?
  • The long-term goal of the UCUT M&E is to make future conditions at restoration sites similar to reference sites. If so, the quantitative objectives and intermediate targets of restoration along the way need to be described to allow measurement of progress. There is no point in waiting for 50 years to declare that a project was unsuccessful before developing alternative actions to achieve intended outcomes.

For details, see the ISRP’s full review memo.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Monitoring and EvaluationISRP2008-007-00Wildlife Category Review

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement