Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Natural Gas Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum
  • Resource Strategies Advisory Committee (Not Active)

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

Energy Forums and Workgroups

  • Pacific NW Demand Response Project
  • Northwest Wind Integration Forum (Archive)
Meetings
See next RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting June 08, 2022 in Portland › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
AUG 2021
WED FRI
04 - 06
RAAC/SAAC - Adequacy/GENESYS Technical Conference
AUG 2021
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
AUG 2021
MON
23
1:00 pm—2:30 pm
Council Meeting Webinar to Discuss the Draft 2021 Power Plan and Decision to Release for Public Review and Comment
AUG 2021
TUE
31
9:00 am—2:45 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
SEP 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE
21
10:00 am—11:00 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE WED
21 - 22
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
27
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Montana
SEP 2021
WED
29
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
07
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Washington
OCT 2021
TUE
12
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Oregon
OCT 2021
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
14
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Idaho
OCT 2021
TUE
19
9:30 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
09
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
30
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
DEC 2021
TUE WED
07 - 08
RTF Meeting
DEC 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—11:00 am
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
DEC 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
WED
19
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
JAN 2022
TUE
25
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation: January 25, 2022
JAN 2022
WED
26
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2022
FRI
28
8:30 am—11:30 am
Power Committee Meeting
FEB 2022
MON
14
9:00 am—10:30 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
FEB 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
FEB 2022
WED
23
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—3:00 pm
System Integration Forum: Scope of Work on Potential Lower Snake River Dam Analysis
MAR 2022
TUE
08
1:30 pm—2:30 pm
Public Affairs Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
MON TUE
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2022
FRI
18
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
30
9:30 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE WED
10 - 11
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
MAY 2022
WED
18
Council Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE
24
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
08
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2022
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2022
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED THU
06 - 07
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
20 - 21
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE
08
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
06 - 07
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Review of the Fort Hall Bottoms Tributary Assessment and Enhancement Strategy (project #1992-010-00) – Response Requested

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2016-14
Published date: 
Oct. 25, 2016
Document state: 
Published

Share

In response to the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s August 11, 2016 request, the Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) reviewed the Fort Hall Bottoms Tributary Assessment and Enhancement Strategy. This document was developed by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribe (SBT) for Project #1992-010-00, Fort Hall Habitat Restoration. The project’s purpose is to restore degraded habitat and promote the survival and population growth of native species, including Yellowstone cutthroat trout, within the Bottoms area. The document is intended to address the condition the Council placed on this project as part of the Resident Fish, Data Management and Program Coordination Category Review in July 2012:

Implement with condition through FY 2014. By March 2014, sponsors to develop and submit for an ISRP review a comprehensive habitat restoration plan to address ISRP qualifications. Council funding recommendation beyond 2014 based on favorable ISRP and Council review of the plan.

The ISRP’s Category Review recommendation (ISRP 2012-6, pages 154-156) included the qualification:

The sponsors should provide a comprehensive habitat restoration plan including a scientifically sound monitoring and evaluation strategy to the ISRP for review within 18 months. The plan should cover both montane and spring streams on the Fort Hall Reservation. The ISRP strongly recommends that the sponsors enlist the assistance of a fluvial geomorphologist in developing the restoration plan and a biostatistician to assist with the design of the M&E plan and analysis of data. Plans developed by the Crystal Springs and Yankee Fork projects may be useful examples. The ISRP also would like to review the Draft Resident Fisheries Management Plan.

ISRP Recommendation: Response Requested

The Fort Hall Bottoms Tributary Assessment and Enhancement Strategy (Strategy) addresses some of the ISRP’s 2012 qualifications. The Strategy provides a good description of the purpose, vision, and goals for the overall project, and it was developed with assistance of fluvial geomorphologists. The Strategy is largely a time schedule for implementation of proposed projects on four streams over a four-year period, but at present it lacks details and appears to fall short of being a systematic planning effort that identifies the most efficient and effective uses of resources. Consequently, the ISRP requests a revised Strategy that addresses the technical issues described below. Elements of a comprehensive plan that are currently missing and should be added to the revised Strategy include:

  1. Yellowstone cutthroat trout population and limiting factors assessment

A comprehensive review is needed of the life history requirements of Yellowstone cutthroat trout and other native fishes in the project area. Such a review should include a description of available data on the status and recovery goals for Yellowstone cutthroat trout in each target stream, identification of the specific factors limiting fish populations in each stream, and an explanation of how proposed habitat management activities will affect these limiting factors. In their July 25, 2016 cover letter to the Council, the proponents describe that an investigation of limiting factors for Yellowstone cutthroat trout population distribution and growth began in 2015.

The results of the 2015 investigation should provide insights into the habitat features that need to be enhanced. Assessments of habitat needs should include (a) spawning, (b) larval and young-of-year rearing, (c) juvenile and adult habitat across all seasons, and (d) necessary movements among habitat patches to effectively complete the life cycle. The revised Strategy should address habitat needs separately for low-gradient spring streams and for higher-gradient mountain and foothills streams.

Insights from the integration of reviews of the life history needs, determination of current status of populations, and assessment of limiting factors for each target species are necessary for identifying potential management actions to alleviate or reduce the factors limiting populations. Such insights may also identify conflicting habitat needs of different species and the need to consider all native fishes in the tributaries.

In sum, linkages are missing but need to be made between the proposed actions associated with each project and the extent of Yellowstone cutthroat trout habitat or population responses that may result. The Strategy needs to better address its primary stated purpose, “to identify a strategy for habitat improvements and management solutions to protect, enhance and/or restore habitat to benefit YCT [Yellowstone cutthroat trout] and other native salmonids within the Bottoms Area.”

  1. Incorporation of Grazing Management, Resident Fish Management, and Tributary Habitat Restoration Plans

Explanation is needed of how the Grazing Management Plan, the Resident Fish Management Plan, and the Tributary Habitat Restoration Plan are being integrated into a comprehensive approach to watershed restoration. It is evident in the Strategy that livestock grazing is a primary cause of stream habitat degradation among the tributary streams and that degraded stream habitat must be restored to benefit Yellowstone cutthroat trout. However, it is not evident how management activities will be integrated to (a) alleviate the impacts of livestock grazing, (b) restore stream habitat features critical to the ability of resident Yellowstone cutthroat trout to complete their life cycle, and (c) enhance the populations of self-sustaining Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the tributary streams. Mention is made of both a Grazing Management Plan and a Resident Fish Management Plan within the Strategy. However, details of these plans are not discussed. The Resident Fish Management Plan should describe management actions that are planned and the array of assessments to be implemented along with a description of methods for conducting assessments.

  1. Justification for sequencing of actions

Explanation and justification is needed regarding the sequencing of proposed project elements. Currently, the proposed enhancement and maintenance projects (pages 39-43) focus heavily on construction of “physical improvements” that modify channel features and appear to be expensive. A time schedule and plan for specific management actions is presented for each of the tributary streams; it appears that construction of physical improvements is proposed to occur simultaneously with watershed and livestock management. It seems that plans for effective management of grazing and resident Yellowstone cutthroat trout should precede a habitat restoration plan and that a habitat restoration plan should be responsive to the needs defined in the grazing and Yellowstone cutthroat trout management plans. Consequently, the proponents should explore and discuss an alternative sequencing approach in which watershed and livestock management practices are initiated and evaluated over several years before decisions are made to initiate more intensive, and potentially more costly, physical improvements.

On page 37 of the Strategy, the following is stated: "It’s important to note that without a proper holistic livestock management plan in place, the other physical improvements recommended herein will not function as intended. It is therefore recommended that an appropriate livestock management plan be developed in conjunction with the other physical improvements recommended in this Tributaries Assessment." The proponents of the Strategy are aware of the grazing issue and the importance of addressing it to facilitate an effective habitat enhancement strategy.

  1. Costs and benefits of management alternatives

Detailed documentation and assessment is needed of the relative costs and benefits of the array of management alternatives proposed for each of the four tributaries with inclusion of full costs for fencing and livestock management. This assessment would help identify the most cost effective means to restore habitat for Yellowstone cutthroat trout and other native fish species. Alternative management actions that could alleviate or reduce the impacts of livestock grazing, the apparent primary cause of habitat degradation in the tributary streams, have not been included. Although the ISRP bases its recommendations on scientific criteria, the ISRP believes the inclusion of a costs and benefits assessment in a revised Strategy would help guide and inform decision makers and restoration practitioners.

  1. Clarification of reach assessment criteria

Each of the tributaries was divided into reaches for both assessment of current conditions and project planning. The criteria used for separation of individual reaches need to be fully explained in the Strategy. Are the distinctions based on geomorphic changes, land use, land ownership, barriers to upstream movement, or other factors that may affect variation in water quality, channel morphology, riparian condition, and/or fish habitat?

  1. Summary of accomplishments

A summary is needed of what has been accomplished since 1992 in the restoration of habitat in the tributary streams and responses of resident populations of Yellowstone cutthroat trout. Given that the project has been active since 1992, there is a number of lessons learned that should be used to inform the Strategy. A good deal of monitoring and evaluation information is provided in the 2012 proposal and in the 2014 Annual Report. This information is not reported or summarized in the Strategy. Given the long history of the project, a separate section—which summarizes protection and restoration work completed, physical and biological responses, and key lessons learned—would be a valuable addition to the revised Strategy. The summary should also describe what restoration activities and results have been accomplished since 2014 when the Strategy was drafted. Was the Strategy useful in guiding restoration activities?

  1. Monitoring and adaptive management

Additional detail is needed in the Monitoring and Adaptive Management section. Although the proponents have indicated that few resources are currently slated for monitoring and evaluation, a plan is needed describing how both habitat and fish will be monitored following the implementation of the proposed projects. Monitoring and evaluation is critically important because it will help the proponents determine if habitat restoration is being achieved and whether fish abundance has increased enough to achieve harvest objectives. 

The Monitoring and Adaptive Management section (page 44) provides a sound justification for monitoring and adaptive management. However, the section needs additional detail. The section includes one brief paragraph on monitoring, but information is needed on how habitat and fish will be monitored before and after the implementation of the proposed projects. Adaptive management is discussed in two paragraphs, but a process for assessment of monitoring data and making decisions on alternative management actions is also necessary. Quantitative objectives and timelines for assessment of management actions for each of the projects are essential elements of monitoring and adaptive management. In short, the Strategy needs to include a more detailed monitoring and adaptive management plan.

The ISRP requests that the proponents address these seven issues, as summarized from the comments below, in the development of a revised Strategy. This revision should be accompanied by a cover letter with point-by-point responses to the ISRP concerns. Additionally, the cover letter should indicate the sections of the revised Strategy in which each concern has been addressed. The ISRP looks forward to receiving these documents within the next 18 to 24 months.

Finally, the Strategy is presented as a very attractive printed document. The high quality illustrations and photos provide an effective mechanism of communication to stakeholders. However, when preparing a technical document for ISRP review, it is more effective to use a standard reporting format (such as a Microsoft Word document) that can be readily modified and updated. This is a programmatic comment that applies to all ISRP reviews.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
ISRP1992-010-00TributaryFort Hall Bottoms

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement