council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2025-26 Amendment Process 2014/2020 Program Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Project Reviews and Recommendations Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

Adaptive Management Anadromous Fish Mitigation Blocked Areas Hatcheries & Artificial Production Invasive and Non-Native Species Lamprey Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds Protected Areas Research Plan Resident Fish Program Tracker: Resources, Tools, Maps Sockeye Sturgeon
Power Planning

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical, and reliable power supply.

Power Planning Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

9th Northwest Power Plan The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials 2021 Plan Mid-term Assessment Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical tools and models

Advisory Committees

Climate and Weather Conservation Resources Demand Forecast Demand Response Fuels Generating Resources Resource Adequacy System Analysis Regional Technical Forum (RTF) RTF Policy

Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

ARCHIVES

Meetings
See next Council Meeting July 15 - 16, 2025 in Portland › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
DEC 2024
WED
04
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
08
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
MON
13
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2025
WED
22
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation
JAN 2025
THU
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2025
MON
27
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
JAN 2025
FRI
31
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
FEB 2025
WED
19
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
20
9:00 am—12:15 pm
RTF Meeting
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
FRI
21
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
FEB 2025
THU
27
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Advisory Committees Combined Meeting
MAR 2025
FRI
07
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Approach to Modeling Operational Risks from Wildfires Webinar
MAR 2025
MON WED
10 - 12
Council Meeting
MAR 2025
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2025
THU
20
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
WED
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
MAR 2025
THU
27
9:00 am—11:00 am
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee - Steering Committee
12:30 pm—1:30 pm
Special Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
03
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Climate and Weather Advisory Committee
APR 2025
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
APR 2025
THU
10
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fuels Advisory Committee Meeting
APR 2025
TUE
15
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Meeting
APR 2025
WED
16
1:30 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
APR 2025
MON
21
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2025
THU
24
9:00 am—10:00 am
Public Affairs Committee
APR 2025
TUE
29
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
MAY 2025
FRI
16
2:00 pm—4:00 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
THU
22
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2025
WED
28
Council Meeting Executive Session
MAY 2025
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
MAY 2025
FRI
30
1:30 pm—3:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JUN 2025
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2025
WED
25
3:00 pm—4:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
JUN 2025
THU
26
8:30 am—2:00 pm
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
WED
09
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee
JUL 2025
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
JUL 2025
THU
17
9:30 am—3:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
JUL 2025
MON
21
10:30 am—12:00 pm
Public Affairs Committee
JUL 2025
TUE
22
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
AUG 2025
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
SEP 2025
TUE
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2025
THU
18
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee
OCT 2025
WED THU
15 - 16
Council Meeting
OCT 2025
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
THU
13
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2025
TUE WED
18 - 19
Council Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2025
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Recommendations to the Bonneville Power Administration regarding conservation acquisition 2002-2006

Council Document Number: 
2000-3
Published date: 
May 4, 2000
Document state: 
Published

Mr. Terry Esvelt
Vice-President, Energy Efficiency
Bonneville Power Administration
P.O. Box 3621
Portland, OR 97208-3621

Dear Mr. Esvelt,

On Wednesday, February 23, the Council approved the attached recommendations for Bonneville's conservation acquisition activities as part of its power augmentation effort. These recommendations are based on the issue paper (99-18) released last December, public comment on that issue paper, and consultations between our staff and others, including your staff. The recommendations are complete with the exception of a conservation target for the Direct Service Industries (DSIs). Staff will be working with the industry and your staff to develop a recommendation for the DSIs.

The Council appreciates the cooperation demonstrated by you and your staff and Bonneville's commitment to achieve at least the target conservation levels. The Council looks forward to working with you, the region's utilities and other stakeholders to achieve this goal.

Sincerely,

Steve Crow
Executive Director

Background

The Bonneville Power Administration intends to augment its power supplies by 800 to 1,000 average megawatts (aMW) to meet expected loads during the 2002 ? 2006 rate period. It intends to accomplish this primarily through market purchases of power but recognizes that the acquisition of cost-effective conservation must also be part of the mix. The key question is how Bonneville can acquire cost-effective conservation during this period in ways that are compatible with the circumstances it faces?

To explore this question, in December the Council released an issue paper (99-18) entitled Bonneville Conservation Acquisition 2002 ? 2006. The paper reviewed the reasons for the conservation mandates of the Northwest Power Act and the experience of the last almost 20 years in implementing conservation, leading to the current situation. It also estimated the amount of conservation that is cost-effective for Bonneville to acquire on a long-term basis. These estimates take into account the changes in expected value of power since the 1998 plan's estimates were developed. The analysis indicates that the approximate development schedule of the cost-effective conservation potential for loads expected to be served by Bonneville would amount to approximately 30 aMW per year at atotal cost of approximately $60 million per year. However, the cost to Bonneville should be significantly less because of customer and end-user contributions.

The paper went on to describe three possible approaches to acquiring conservation for the 2002 ? 2006 period. One is the traditional, long-term approach in which conservation investments are valued over their useful life. This approach has proven effective in the past but exposes Bonneville to the risk that it will not receive the full benefit of its investments if customers take load off at the end of the contract period. A second approach is intended to have effects for Bonneville that are as much as possible like a relatively short-term purchase of power on the market. This approach removes most risk from Bonneville but seems unlikely to produce additional conservation that would not have occurred in response to market forces. Finally, a "middle ground" approach was described in which Bonneville is willing to pay for conservation savings as long as and to the extent that a customer keeps load on Bonneville. Bonneville would endeavor to limit what it pays to have minimal impact on its net revenue requirement. This approach limits Bonneville's risk while permitting development of longer payback, but still cost-effective conservation.

Finally, the paper made some draft recommendations, proposing to endorse the "middle ground" approach and the overall conservation target and making some specific implementation recommendations.

The Council heard from a panel at the January meeting responding to the Issue Paper and took extensive written public comment. The recommendations that follow are based on the analysis in the issue paper, public comment on that paper and consultations that staff has held with Bonneville and other interests. These recommendations are intended to guide Bonneville in conservation acquisition as part of their power augmentation effort.

Recommendations

Overall Approach

It is recommended that Bonneville use the "Middle Ground" approach described in the Issue Paper. The pertinent features of this approach are as follows.

  • Bonneville should strive to acquire conservation for as little as it can while still meeting its goal. It should not employ an explicit rate-impact test. Doing so could, in some circumstances, disadvantage Bonneville in negotiating what it will pay for conservation and, in other circumstances, could result in very cost-effective conservation going undeveloped.
  • What it is willing to pay for conservation savings should be based on the market value of the saving produced. Because market prices exhibit much more seasonal and daily variation that in the past, the time at which savings are produced should be reflected in the value. Similarly, where there are variations in value due to geographic location, those values should also be taken into account and captured by the Power Business Line if possible.
  • Bonneville's should be willing to acquire conservation that would produce savings beyond the 2002-2006 period. However, if customers choose not to contract with Bonneville beyond that period, they accept the responsibility for any costs not yet recovered or savings yet to be delivered to Bonneville.
  • The conservation acquisition is intended to reduce the necessity for market purchases of power. Therefore, it will be necessary for customers that purchase other than load-based products from Bonneville (e.g. a block purchase) to commit to reducing their purchase from Bonneville in the amount of the saving to be produced by Bonneville-funded conservation.

Conservation Target

The conservation target proposed in the issue paper was determined by allocating the regional resource potential on the basis of the percentage of loads estimated to be served by Bonneville in the 2002 ? 2006 period. Comment was received to the effect that the allocation overlooked the pre-subscription loads served by Bonneville and did not include the full responsibility for IOU residential and small farm loads. Inclusion of these factors would tend to increase the amount allocated to Bonneville. At the same time, Direct Service Industry loads were inappropriately included in determining the allocation when the regional conservation potential does not include an estimate of conservation potential in the DSIs. These recommendations reallocate the regional target to Bonneville according to the revised load estimates and estimating a separate target for the DSIs.

The issue paper also recommended that the savings produced as a result of the Conservation and Renewables Discount, Bonneville's "share" of the savings produced by the activities of the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) and the savings produced by Bonneville-funded low-income weatherization be counted toward the regional target. The Council believes this is appropriate. However, the Council also believes it is important to provide a clear, unambiguous target for power augmentation and to avoid pressures that might distort the missions of these other activities. Consequently, these recommendations provide estimates of the amount of savings that will be produced by these activities a priori and reduce the augmentation target levels by those amounts. The targets are as presented in Table 1. These targets are based on current estimates of Bonneville's subscription loads. The targets will be revised as necessary when subscription is complete.

Table 1

Bonneville "Share" of regional Non-DSI potential 2002 ? 2006

166 average megawatts

Target for savings produced by activities under Conservation and Renewables Discount; Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, and low-income weatherization 2002 ? 2006

80 average megawatts

Bonneville Non-DSI augmentation target 2002 ? 2006

86 average megawatts

Bonneville DSI augmentation target 2002 ? 2006

Under development

Bonneville total augmentation target 2002 ? 2006

86 average megawatts plus DSI target

The Council recommends that the target be considered a minimum, not a maximum. Staff has identified conservation that could be cost-effective to implement earlier than was specified in the Power Plan. Bonneville should acquire that conservation it can identify that is cost-effective

Modification of the Conservation and Renewables Discount

The issue paper proposed considering modifications to the Conservation and Renewable Discount (C&R D) so that it could serve as the basis of the augmentation effort. Information being produced by the Regional Technical Forum for the C&R D will be helpful in the augmentation effort. However, the Council recommends that the C&R D not be modified. It was designed with a different purpose in mind and would require extensive modification to be the basis for the acquisition activity. Since it is part of the rate case, significant changes would delay the rate case.

Implementation

The issue paper proposed that a competitive bid process that includes the possible participation of third parties be used for the augmentation process. The paper was not, however, clear about what that meant. The Council recognizes that for some more or less standard conservation measures or programs, primarily affecting the residential and small commercial sectors, a "standard offer" approach (i.e., "If you do X we will pay you Y") may be more efficient. The Council recommends that the standard offer approach be used where appropriate. The Council continues to believe that for industrial and large commercial, where the bulk of the potential lies, a more flexible approach is required. The Council recommends that Bonneville solicit interest from customers and third parties and work with those parties to negotiate mutually acceptable terms (quantity, price, timing, etc.). Bonneville's utility customers should have first right of refusal but should not have the ability to block access of consumers to Bonneville-supported conservation services.

Monitoring Progress

While not addressed explicitly by the issue paper, comments were received to the effect that progress toward achieving the conservation target should be carefully monitored so that corrective action can be taken on a timely basis if necessary. The Council requests that Bonneville report to the Council regarding the progress made in acquiring conservation as part of the power augmentation effort on at least a bi-annual basis. Reporting should include documented savings from the Conservation & Renewables Rate discount the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance and low-income weatherization. For the C&R Discount, only those savings documented through use of Regional Technical Forum evaluation protocols and/or deemed measure savings should be counted. To the extent the overall conservation target is not achieved, the Council expects that Bonneville will undertake additional efforts to meet the overall target.

Transmission Business Line

The issue paper proposed that the Transmission Business Lined cooperate in funding conservation activities where transmission system saving would result. The Council encourages the Transmission Business Line to invest in conservation and demand management where such investment can reduce transmission investment requirements. However, to preserve the separation of Bonneville's transmission and power marketing functions, PBLs and TBLs conservation/demand management activities should not be combined.

Renewable Resources

Renewable resources were not addressed in the issue paper. The Act requires that resources being acquired by Bonneville be cost-effective. The Council's current plan does not identify any cost-effective renewables. If a developer or sponsor offers to sell power from renewable resources to Bonneville at a competitive rate, Bonneville can and should acquire that power. The Council supports renewables demonstration and "green-power" marketing efforts to stimulate renewables development. The C&R Discount is a vehicle that is appropriate for funding such activities.

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

© NW Power & Conservation Council

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement