Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting April 11 - 12, 2023 in (Webinar) › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
27
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—12:45 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
10
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
30
9:00 am—11:00 am
F&W Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
31
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2022
MON
12
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE
20
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Tech Committee
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2022
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE
11
9:00 am—1:00 pm
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2022
THU
03
9:30 am—3:30 pm
GENESYS Technical Conference (SAAC/RAAC Combined)
NOV 2022
TUE
08
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Technical/Steering Comm Meetings
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
MON
05
1:30 pm—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
DEC 2022
TUE
06
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
WED
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
FEB 2023
WED
22
2:00 pm—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources/Demand Response Adv Comm Combined Meeting
FEB 2023
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
FRI
24
9:00 am—2:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Comm.
MAR 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2023
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2023
THU
23
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Technical Committee
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED THU
21 - 22
RTF Meeting June 21-22, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Review of 2009 Fish and Wildlife Program

Council Document Number: 
ISAB 2013-1
Published date: 
March 8, 2013
Document state: 
Published

Share

ISAB Chair Rich Alldredge, Vice-chair Chris Wood, and member Greg Ruggerone presented findings from this report at the Council’s March 13 meeting in Portland.

Executive Summary

This report contains the evaluation by the Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB) of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's 2009 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Program). In general, the ISAB finds the 2009 Program to have been a useful framework for providing context for the complex issues facing the altered Columbia River Basin ecosystem. In Part I, we revisit the conceptual foundation for the Program, focusing primarily on recommendations for updating the scientific principles based on advances in the sciences of landscape ecology and complex adaptive systems. In Part II, we examine progress in implementing the Program and in monitoring its outcomes; then we consider some major threats to future success and identify potential gaps in the current Program. In Part III, we discuss some general opportunities for improving the effectiveness of the Program. 

Sustainability as a conceptual foundation

The concept of sustainability in ecology describes how biological systems remain diverse, robust, and productive over time. Sustainability can be enhanced by building ecosystem resilience and adaptability. Natural systems do not fluctuate within a fixed range of variability. What we have seen historically will not be a reliable indicator of the future, and we must seek to be more flexible and adaptable in our management responses. Uncertainty is inevitable and is an essential feature of resilience thinking, structured decision making, and adaptive management. Success is not a completed state, but a process requiring sustained monitoring, intentional learning, communication, and cooperation. Indeed, the Program amendment can be considered as the learning phase of the adaptive management cycle, and as an opportunity to benefit from 30 years of experience.

Threats to sustainability

In this review, the ISAB has identified major threats to the sustainability of the Columbia River ecosystem and to the success of the Program. This list includes loss of biological diversity, climate change (both directly and indirectly through linkages to the ocean ecosystem), proliferation of chemicals and contaminants within the Basin (including the estuary), the emergence of hybrid food webs due to the spread of non-native and artificially propagated species, and a failure to understand and respect the carrying capacity of the Columbia River ecosystem.

Biological diversity arises naturally within diverse landscapes and habitats, and it provides the redundancy and options for ecological innovation that contribute to resilience and adaptability in the face of environmental variability and change. The capacity to systematically monitor biological diversity at scales relevant to the Basin is limited. Moreover, relatively little effort is being directed at documenting trends in diversity or at understanding how actions implemented across the Basin affect diversity and the consequences of losing diversity. The ISAB recommends that the Program develop quantitative objectives for diversity and promote an active program of research to systematically collect information so that trends in biological diversity can be monitored and reported at the scale of the entire Basin.

Climate change predictions point toward changes in the timing and distribution of water flow, including extreme events such as floods and droughts. The concept of return periods of floods and droughts based on historical data may no longer be adequate for designing and planning for extreme events. Fisheries impacts due to warmer water temperatures include physiological effects such as lower growth rates that can result in higher predation, increased susceptibility to invasive and non-native species, and reduced cold water refuges. Ocean habitat suitable for salmonids in the Gulf of Alaska is projected to be substantially reduced in extent by the 2080s, due to changes in temperature, salinity, and acidification.Given the importance of climate change to the success of the Program, the ISAB recommends that the amended Program promote development of a comprehensive strategic plan to explore strategies to cope with potential impacts of climate change throughout the Basin. Modeling and analyses are needed to provide guidance for flood control and hydropower operations to enhance ecosystem resilience and adaptability under climate change.

Artificial chemical proliferation in the Basin is a priority for resolution. In addition to contaminants of the past, there is a growing concern about emerging contaminants. The estuary and the coastal ocean communities are particularly vulnerable to the accumulation of contaminants because of their spatial position in the watershed. There is an urgent need to quantify and map the spatial patterns of these chemicals; assess their transfer, accumulation, and persistence; and document their impact on native organisms and on the carrying capacity of the Columbia River ecosystem for juvenile salmonids. The Council has an opportunity to take an active role – through cooperation with regional partners – to ensure that monitoring of toxic contaminants and evaluation of their effects on fish and wildlife are addressed.

Non-native species’ spread is a major issue confronting the Program. Well-reasoned policies and procedures are needed to address the risk posed by non-native species, as well as native species spreading outside of their native ranges within the Basin. The Program could play a key role in fostering development of policies and effective methods for monitoring and controlling the spread of these species.

The limitation of the carrying capacity for juvenile salmonids is an urgent and specific priority for research, management, and restoration activities in the Basin. It is not clear whether the Columbia River can provide sufficient food in the long term to support the large populations of artificially propagated fishes produced today, as well as natural salmonids and other organisms. The concept of carrying capacity for target species in the Basin must ultimately constrain Program objectives related to the abundance and productivity of those species. The amended Program should explicitly address carrying capacity for juvenile salmonids when integrating and prioritizing plans for hatchery production and habitat restoration. The ISAB also sees a need to conduct empirical investigations and to develop bioenergetic models to estimate trophic demands on food supplies by native and non-native competitors of juvenile salmonids.

Artificial production, used to mitigate for lost harvest opportunities, must be reconciled with the objectives of ESA recovery and threats such production poses to the restoration of healthy natural populations. Implementation of artificial production must consider scientific insights about the need to maintain the diversity of heterogeneous populations and habitats that confer resilience. Hatchery fish provide important benefits to some of the Basin's stakeholders and populations, but the trade-off in costs to natural production and other environmental consequences remain poorly understood. The ISAB recommends that the artificial strategies be revised to incorporate conclusions from the Hatchery Scientific Review Group’s review and that supplementation, harvest, and habitat restoration programs must be well integrated to be effective.

Harvest plans need to be scientifically justified and consistent with subbasin and other plans that establish viability parameters for salmon and steelhead populations. It is not clear whether harvest management plans have been scientifically reviewed and analyzed to assess compatibility with the Program. If not, an independent scientific review should be encouraged. The amended Program should also promote development of capability to monitor hatchery and natural-origin fish separately so that the productivity and abundance of the naturally-reproducing stock can be tracked and used to develop escapement goals and harvest rates.

Key advice on moving forward

Three fundamental issues warrant reconsideration in amending the Program. First, it would be timely for the Council and region to re-evaluate the scientific foundation in light of accomplishments of the Program during the past 30 years. A review of the Program’s foundation might lead to reassessment of the long-term objectives and the strategies to achieve those objectives. Second, there is a need to move away from qualitative goals toward quantitative objectives with specified timelines. Third, there is a need for increased socioeconomic engagement as part of a landscape approach. The current Program is intended to be habitat-based but in reality, relies heavily on artificial production; the amended Program should be ecosystem-based and fully acknowledge social aspects of the Program that can contribute to its success.

The ISAB believes that the scientific foundation should be modified to more explicitly consider the basis of resilience and adaptability, and to include additional emphasis on the landscape approach to fish and wildlife management (ISAB 2011-1, 2011-4). Accordingly, the ISAB proposes six revised principles based on recent advances in scientific knowledge about the nature of ecosystems. These new principles are intended to replace the original eight principles, but they retain most of the original content.

Establishing quantitative performance goals both for the biological objectives and restoration strategies is an essential feature of adaptive management and provides measurable thresholds for determining success. True objectives are focused and measurable benchmarks whereas many of the “objectives” identified in the 2009 Program express general intentions as unquantified goals or strategies to achieve goals. The amended Program should include quantitative biological objectives that can be regularly monitored and evaluated as a means to determine whether the Program is on target or in need of change.

Social aspects of the Program should include stronger efforts to foster leadership and to build the structures that provide governance needed for broad collaboration and effective integration across science-management disciplines and social, political, and ecological boundaries. The revised Program should recommit to regional partnerships and explore similar ideas to strengthen regional coordination efforts, and share information and learning among projects with common settings or issues. The Program should be amended to describe techniques for engaging broader public involvement and to explain how socioeconomic engagement will be measured and monitored.

A primary conclusion of this review is that continuing to implement the Program on its existing trajectory is highly uncertain to achieve the Council’s biological objectives for the Basin. The ISAB suggests a revised focus on sustainability with strategies to protect diversity and resilience, and to build adaptability.The ISAB is concerned that artificial propagation is a risky foundation for restoration, and that adaptive management, long considered an integral component of the Program, has not been conducted in the manner originally envisioned. A landscape perspective, drawing from broader community involvement, could help build consensus on Program objectives and strategies, or if this is not possible, it could at least help to create strategies that keep options open, consistent with a diversity of visions for the future. The ISAB recommends that Council decisions be guided by the precautionary principle and structured decision making, within an adaptive management cycle.

See the full report for the ISAB’s full rationale and details.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Fish and Wildlife ProgramColumbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife ProgramISAB

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions