Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Natural Gas Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum
  • Resource Strategies Advisory Committee (Not Active)

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

Energy Forums and Workgroups

  • Pacific NW Demand Response Project
  • Northwest Wind Integration Forum (Archive)
Meetings
See next RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting June 08, 2022 in Portland › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
AUG 2021
WED FRI
04 - 06
RAAC/SAAC - Adequacy/GENESYS Technical Conference
AUG 2021
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
AUG 2021
MON
23
1:00 pm—2:30 pm
Council Meeting Webinar to Discuss the Draft 2021 Power Plan and Decision to Release for Public Review and Comment
AUG 2021
TUE
31
9:00 am—2:45 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
SEP 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE
21
10:00 am—11:00 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE WED
21 - 22
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
27
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Montana
SEP 2021
WED
29
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
07
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Washington
OCT 2021
TUE
12
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Oregon
OCT 2021
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
14
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Idaho
OCT 2021
TUE
19
9:30 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
09
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
30
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
DEC 2021
TUE WED
07 - 08
RTF Meeting
DEC 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—11:00 am
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
DEC 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
WED
19
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
JAN 2022
TUE
25
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation: January 25, 2022
JAN 2022
WED
26
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2022
FRI
28
8:30 am—11:30 am
Power Committee Meeting
FEB 2022
MON
14
9:00 am—10:30 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
FEB 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
FEB 2022
WED
23
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—3:00 pm
System Integration Forum: Scope of Work on Potential Lower Snake River Dam Analysis
MAR 2022
TUE
08
1:30 pm—2:30 pm
Public Affairs Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
MON TUE
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2022
FRI
18
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
30
9:30 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE WED
10 - 11
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
MAY 2022
WED
18
Council Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE
24
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
08
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2022
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2022
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED THU
06 - 07
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
20 - 21
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE
08
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
06 - 07
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Review of "A Method and Criteria for Evaluating the Technical Merits and Feasibility of Watershed/Habitat Projects"

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 97-2
Published date: 
Aug. 15, 1997
Document state: 
Published

Share

The ISRP believes the proposed criteria for evaluating the technical merits and feasibility of watershed/habitat projects represent an important and useful method of screening new projects and evaluating ongoing projects for funding. In this report we focus on the specific request from the Northwest Power Planning Council to examine the procedure for subbasin prioritization and the criteria for rating on-the-ground projects.

The criteria are an excellent start at defining the approach to selecting watershed/habitat projects for funding. The methods and criteria include many of the evaluation features recommended by the ISG in Return to the River and the ISRP in its programmatic review of the Fish & Wildlife Plan (ISRP Report 97-1), including the very important role of peer review in improving projects through constructive criticism. As it stands, a major deficiency in the current document is the sample proposal, which, in the ISRP's view, is a good project summary but lacks the documentation that is needed in an actual proposal. Proposers should be provided with a more complete example.

Another difficulty is that proposal solicitation will take place in advance of a basin-wide synthesis of information and prioritization that will guide implementation of measures in the Fish & Wildlife Plan. Both proposers and proposal reviewers must have an agreed-upon view of the technical criteria that define good and poor habitat. Delaying completion of these criteria and definitions until the FY1999 review process, as suggested in the document, is risky. In one sense, this document may place the "cart before the horse" by attempting to define criteria to protect the best remaining habitat without fully specifying what attributes of the habitat make it stand out above other areas.

Nevertheless, the ISRP agrees that watershed/habitat project proposals and evaluations should be:

  • Based on a clearly stated set of objectives that address one or more key elements of the Fish and Wildlie Plan.
  • Grounded in a thorough watershed assessment that recognizes the importance of protecting or re-establishing normative conditions.
  • Aware of the need to avoid harm to non-target species while enhancing conditions for target species.
  • Cost-effective, with a minimum of annual operation and maintenance costs.
  • Subjected to an unbiased peer review to determine the technical need for the project and the likelihood that it will succeed.

The procedure for prioritizing subbasins, as it is currently drafted, does not provide enough detail for determining which watersheds are best, which watersheds can be fixed, and which watersheds should not receive restoration funding because the potential for recovery is low. The ISRP cautions against "writing off" any subbasin because of its current condition; such a strategy may lead to further loss of isolated small populations that are an important part of the metapopulation structure of the species. Although the strategy as written emphasizes protection over restoration, it seems very likely that the majority of funding will go toward habitat improvement projects rather than acquisition of riparian and floodplain areas. However, a process for acquiring such areas should be given serious consideration.

The ISRP suggests that an explicit conceptual framework for matching watershed/habitat projects to the extent of alteration be adopted, such as the one proposed in the NRC report Upstream. A diagram of the framework is included in this report.

The ISRP suggests a modified matrix for on-the-ground project evaluation. The matrix is based on continuously variable numerical scores for each of a series of evaluation criteria. Evaluations should be limited to technical experts with no direct scientific or institutional connection to the project in question. Recommendations for funding or no funding should accompany each numerical score so that proposers can understand the basis for evaluation.

Finally, the document does not explicitly acknowledge that the ISRP will also be reviewing all Fish & Wildlife Plan projects annually. The ISRP will be looking for technical details describing rationale, experimental or management design, sampling methods and analysis, monitoring and evaluation, qualifications of participants, and relevance to specific measures of the Fish & Wildlife Plan. The ISRP may or may not agree with CBFWA recommendations, but agreement is much more likely if technical details are supplied by proposers and used by CBFWA to assess their overall merit. It is for this reason that the example in the document should contain details adequate for an objective scientific evaluation. Additionally, the ISRP recommends that similar criteria be used to evaluate proposals pertaining to resident fishes.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
HabitatISRP

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement