Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum
  • Resource Strategies Advisory Committee (Not Active)

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission

Energy Forums and Workgroups

  • Pacific NW Demand Response Project
  • Northwest Wind Integration Forum (Archive)
Meetings
See next Council Meeting August 16 - 17, 2022 in (Webinar) › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
SEP 2021
TUE
21
10:00 am—11:00 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2021
TUE WED
21 - 22
RTF Meeting
SEP 2021
MON
27
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Montana
SEP 2021
WED
29
9:00 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
07
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Washington
OCT 2021
TUE
12
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Oregon
OCT 2021
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
OCT 2021
THU
14
Power Plan Public Hearing Hosted by Idaho
OCT 2021
TUE
19
9:30 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
09
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
NOV 2021
TUE
30
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
DEC 2021
TUE WED
07 - 08
RTF Meeting
DEC 2021
MON
13
9:00 am—11:00 am
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup
DEC 2021
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JAN 2022
WED
19
1:00 pm—5:00 pm
Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
JAN 2022
TUE
25
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF New Member Orientation: January 25, 2022
JAN 2022
WED
26
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JAN 2022
FRI
28
8:30 am—11:30 am
Power Committee Meeting
FEB 2022
MON
14
9:00 am—10:30 am
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
FEB 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
FEB 2022
WED
23
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—3:00 pm
System Integration Forum: Scope of Work on Potential Lower Snake River Dam Analysis
MAR 2022
TUE
08
1:30 pm—2:30 pm
Public Affairs Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
MON TUE
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2022
FRI
18
9:00 am—11:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Committee Meeting
MAR 2022
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
MAR 2022
WED
30
9:30 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2022
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE WED
10 - 11
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
MAY 2022
WED
18
Council Meeting
MAY 2022
TUE
24
9:00 am—2:30 pm
RTF Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
08
1:00 pm—3:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
9:30 am—11:30 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2022
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2022
WED
22
9:00 am—2:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
06
F&W Committee Meeting
JUL 2022
FRI
08
9:00 am—10:30 am
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Steering Committee
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
27
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—12:45 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
10
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
30
9:00 am—11:00 am
F&W Committee Meeting
SEP 2022
MON
12
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
20 - 21
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE
08
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
06 - 07
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Review of Fiscal Year 2004 Pre-proposals for the US Army Corps of Engineers' Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2003-14
Published date: 
Oct. 15, 2003
Document state: 
Published

Share

In 1998, the U.S. Congress' Senate-House conference report on the Fiscal Year 1999 Energy and Water Development Appropriations bill directed the Independent Scientific Review Panel to review the fish and wildlife projects, programs, or measures included in federal agency budgets that are reimbursed by the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville's "reimbursable" program). The ISRP is to use the same standards and make recommendations as in its review of the projects proposed to implement the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Pursuant to the conference report, in June 2003, the Council requested the ISRP to focus its Fiscal Year 2004 reimbursable review effort on the United States Army Corps of Engineers' Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program (AFEP), which is one component of Bonneville's "reimbursable" program.

The AFEP's main purpose is to produce scientific information to assist the Corps in making engineering, design, and operations decisions for the eight mainstem Columbia and Snake River hydroelectric projects to provide safe, efficient passage of fish through the mainstem migration corridor. Funding for the AFEP is appropriated by Congress, expended by the Corps, and reimbursed by Bonneville. Unlike projects directly funded through the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program, AFEP projects have not undergone ISRP review; consequently, this review provides the opportunity to ensure that AFEP proposals receive a similar level of scrutiny for scientific soundness as Fish and Wildlife Program proposals.

This is the first of two reports pertaining to the ISRP's review. In this report, the ISRP provides comments on each of the 52 pre-proposals submitted to meet the research needs for the AFEP in Fiscal Year 2004. The report is intended to aid the Corps in selecting among pre-proposals and assist the project sponsors in drafting final proposals. However, the ISRP comments are limited because the pre-proposals did not provide enough information for a complete technical review. The Council's request specified that the ISRP's technical review be at a pilot scale and the ISRP focus on subsets of AFEP proposals covering the estuary and fish survival at the Columbia River federal hydroelectric projects (project survival). In consultation with Council and Corps staff, the ISRP further defined the subset of project survival proposals as those for the John Day, Ice Harbor, and The Dalles dams. Consequently, the ISRP assigned at least three reviewers to examine the highlighted subsets of proposals. One reviewer, but usually two or more, also reviewed the other proposals so that the ISRP could grasp the full extent of the AFEP.

The review steps to this stage that have included an ISRP or Peer Review Group member are:

  1. participation in an AFEP overview presentation from the Corps,
  2. observation of Corps' meetings where one-page statements of needs were developed,
  3. observation of Study Review Work Group and System Configuration Team meetings for prioritizing statements of needs and proposed studies,
  4. review of pre-proposals in relation to the statements of needs,
  5. participation in the Corps' AFEP pre-proposals presentation and discussion meeting, and
  6. discussion of the pre-proposals with the full ISRP to draft consensus comments.

The ISRP's pre-proposal review is intended to engage the ISRP in the Corps' project selection process so that the ISRP can gather sufficient information to make project specific and programmatic assessments on the substance, scale, scope, and process of the AFEP, and to compare the AFEP with the Council's Fish and Wildlife Program. The timing of the ISRP's pre-proposal reviews was selected to be least disruptive of the Corps' normal, annual cycle of selecting AFEP projects. The AFEP schedule and process of setting priorities and selecting projects are significantly different from that of the Fish and Wildlife Program.

The ISRP will observe several important remaining steps in the AFEP process before its review is finished. These include the Corps' selection of pre-proposals for implementation or further consideration, the development of pre-proposals into statements of work, and the reporting of study results at the annual AFEP research workshop. In recognition of these remaining steps, the ISRP defers making overall programmatic comments and final recommendations on projects until the review is complete. The ISRP will issue a second report by mid-January 2004 that will provide programmatic comments and recommendations on the Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program and project selection process as a whole, and will specifically address the questions described in the section below.

One issue the ISRP intends to fully address in its final report is how to best incorporate scientific peer review in the Corps' process. Most of the pre-proposals reviewed by the ISRP are not well enough developed to be amenable to scientific review and, as written, do not meet ISRP criteria for scientific soundness. Detail on research methods and study variables is particularly lacking in the pre-proposals. For some pre-proposals this lack of detail is because the researchers are analyzing 2003 data, and/or 2004 hydro-operation plans are not finalized. These proposals (e.g. #s 13, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, etc) contain statements indicating that the 2004 study designs will not be finalized until: "the final set of objectives and hypotheses has been selected", "2003 data are completed", or "until the operational test designs are determined after further discussion this fall". It is understandable that study designs and objectives should be largely based on the most up-to-date data, but the specification of the variables to be tested for effects on survival is essential for the development of a complete, appropriate study plan. The variables chosen for analysis are significant determinants of whether the project will significantly contribute to problem solving, and these variables should be subject to review. Conducting a meaningful technical review without a detailed study design is not possible.

Other pre-proposals are not as constrained by hydro-operations or past years' data (e.g. estuary or avian predation pre-proposals) but still do not provide details that should (and could) be provided to enable scientific review and comparison between competing proposals.

To support a thorough and efficient scientific review, detail on project background and relation to passage problems should be documented and provided along with fully developed proposals. In the next stage of the review, the ISRP will review final study designs or statements of work for many of these proposals. Project details adequate to support scientific review may be provided at this stage. As the ISRP drafts its programmatic report it will address the questions below with specific attention given to whether the AFEP project development and funding process is sequenced so that an ISRP or other independent review can usefully influence the development of proposals, inform policy decisions surrounding the proposals, and ensure program accountability.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Fish PassageAnadromous FishUS Army Corps of EngineersISRP

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement