council logo
Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations F&W Program Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting December 12 - 13, 2023 in (Webinar) › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting June 21, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
FRI
14
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2023
THU
20
9:00 am—3:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
05
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
THU
21
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Governors Report and Future Reporting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE
17
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE
24
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
NOV 2023
WED
01
9:30 am—4:00 pm
Reserves in Power Planning Workshop
NOV 2023
THU
02
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—12:30 pm
RTF Meeting
1:00 pm—2:30 pm
Public Affairs Committee Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JAN 2024
MON
08
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Informal Hatchery Workgroup Meeting
JAN 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
JAN 2024
WED
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2024
TUE WED
06 - 07
Council Meeting
FEB 2024
TUE WED
13 - 14
RTF Meeting
MAR 2024
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
MAR 2024
TUE
19
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
APR 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
APR 2024
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2024
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAY 2024
TUE WED
21 - 22
RTF Meeting
JUN 2024
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUN 2024
TUE
18
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
JUL 2024
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2024
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
AUG 2024
TUE WED
20 - 21
RTF Meeting
SEP 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
SEP 2024
TUE
17
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2024
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeting
OCT 2024
WED
16
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
NOV 2024
TUE WED
19 - 20
RTF Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Review of Lake Roosevelt Northern Pike Suppression Proposal (1994-043-00)

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2016-2
Published date: 
Jan. 25, 2016
Document state: 
Published

Share

In response to the Council’s December 8, 2015 request, the ISRP reviewed the Spokane Tribe of Indians’ Fiscal Year 2016 proposed “Lake Roosevelt Northern Pike Suppression Plan.” This proposed suppression effort is a scope change for the ongoing Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Evaluation Program (Data Collection) project (#1994-043-00). The proposed effort is intended to reduce the proliferation of northern pike in Lake Roosevelt through immediate suppression actions guided by studies evaluating the proposed techniques. This proposal is based on baseline data from a pilot study on the northern pike population in Lake Roosevelt (reported within the proposal), which indicated a recent marked increase in abundance of northern pike. Northern pike are voracious predators that threaten native species and non-native game fishes, and they have the potential to move downstream in the Columbia River to possibly impact the recovery of ESA listed salmon.

The proposed northern pike suppression project for Lake Roosevelt is closely related to work by the Kalispel Tribe in Box Canyon Reservoir, Pend Oreille Subbasin, Washington (projects #1997-004-00 and #2007-149-00). The ISRP concluded that the Kalispel Tribe’s effort to suppress the northern pike population in Box Canyon Reservoir was justified. The proponents of the Box Canyon Reservoir suppression effort are applying gillnetting techniques to target spawning populations in shallow water. The proponents of the Box Canyon effort concluded from a pilot study that “intensively netting northern pike in sloughs and backwaters from ice off through the spring freshet could drastically reduce the abundance of northern pike in Box Canyon Reservoir.” They set an objective to reduce northern pike abundance by 85% in Box Canyon Reservoir, which is likely to require more annual effort (i.e., more gillnetting during the spawning period and/or more gillnetting at other times of the year) than was conducted during the pilot study. 

ISRP Recommendation: Response Requested

This proposal is consistent with the Box Canyon Reservoir northern pike suppression effort. However, further development of several elements of this proposal would improve its scientific credibility:

(1) The proposal should include clearly state hypotheses about northern pike suppression that will be tested. For several activities proposed – including suppression, telemetry, and index netting – there is no indication as to how these activities are expected to yield an understanding of the effectiveness of the proposed northern pike suppression program. (See Comments, 1. Sound science principles [i.e., methods],#4below for examples of testable hypotheses.)

(2) The proponents should explain why they believe their proposed removal effort and monitoring will be adequate to control or suppress the northern pike population and measure resulting benefits. The concern about northern pike introduction in the Columbia River Basin needs to be addressed, both at the sources and downriver. From a source in Lonepine Reservoir in the Little Bitterroot system where northern pike were introduced in the 1950s, northern pike have subsequently spread downstream in the Flathead River, into the Clark Fork and Lake Pend Oreille, and into the Pend Oreille River, Box Canyon Reservoir, and into Lake Roosevelt. Northern pike are probably well-established in all of these waters. The expansion of northern pike is a systemwide problem with a continual source of fish upriver from Lake Roosevelt. This reality is not discussed or dealt with in the proposal. Therefore, there is reason to be skeptical that the proposed suppression effort will be sufficient to reduce the long-term abundance of northern pike in Lake Roosevelt to a level where meaningful benefits can be observed. It is requested that evidence or rationale be provided by the proponents addressing their ability to control or suppress the northern pike population. Additionally, they should provide details on the methods used to measure benefits, the amount of effort required, and the specifics of the monitoring program.

(3) The proposal should include clearly defined quantitative objectives with targets (i.e., outcomes, endpoints) over specified time periods. Only a vague statement describing the desired outcome is presented in the proposal (see Comments, 3. Clearly defined objectives and outcomesbelow). Effective adaptive management requires development and use of quantitative objectives in proposals and management plans.

(4) The proposal calls for “Spring Pike Index Netting” to occur annually, but there is no mention as to how the resulting monitoring data will be used to evaluate the suppression program. Data analyses should be linked to assessment of hypotheses (#1 above) and quantifiable objectives (#3 above).

(5) There is no mention of a component to evaluate the extent of removal that may occur from the proposed effort. The proposal should address what could be done to estimate the annual exploitation rate (i.e., annual fishing mortality) of northern pike and the relationships to abundance, length structure, age structure, total mortality, and other indices of northern pike population structure and dynamics. Have mark-recapture studies in conjunction with suppression efforts been considered?

(6) The description of the telemetry component is insufficient for the reviewers to make judgments. More detail is needed. Additional information should address what the proponents want to learn from the telemetry study and how this information will be used to improve the northern pike suppression efforts?

(7) There is a need to assess the extent of by-catch and its potential impacts on native and desired non-native fish populations in the reservoir. Although by-catch will be greatly reduced by netting northern pike at spawning time, it is not clear that this limited netting approach over a short time and relatively small area will be adequate to reduce northern pike abundance in Lake Roosevelt. Gillnetting at other times and locations, which may be necessary, would likely yield more by-catch mortality. There is a need for a clearly stated quantitative objective regarding maximum acceptable by-catch and how the objective has been determined and will be assessed.

(8) An important task in the near future is to assess the impacts of northern pike on focal species. For example, a bioenergetics model could be coupled with population estimates to approximate the effects of pike suppression compared with no suppression where the predator population is allowed to grow. These issues should be discussed in the proposal and the contributions that the Lake Roosevelt northern pike suppression project may make should be stated.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Northern PikeProposalLake RooseveltISRP1994-043-00

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook X.com threads Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2023

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions Inclusion Statement